Tools & Wizards About Us
redial.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

redial.in

Under Construction

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

499 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

redial.in screenshot

About Website

Visit redial.in now to see the best up-to-date Redial content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about redial.in

Real estate in india, Property in india, Property for sale, Buy Rent property, Residential Commercial property in india for sale, india properties for sale, real estate properties.

Visit redial.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Redial.in page load time and found that the first response time was 499 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

redial.in performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

redial.in

499 ms

www.redial.in

635 ms

css

67 ms

header3.css

259 ms

red_new_edi1.css

491 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Redial.in, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Redial.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 559.3 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

948.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Redial.in main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 737.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 50.7 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 737.0 kB
  • After minification 722.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Redial images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 354.8 kB

  • Original 538.0 kB
  • After minification 536.9 kB
  • After compression 183.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 354.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 146.7 kB

  • Original 178.2 kB
  • After minification 171.9 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redial.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Redial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

redial.in

redial.in

499 ms

www.redial.in

www.redial.in

635 ms

css

css

67 ms

header3.css

header3.css

259 ms

red_new_edi1.css

red_new_edi1.css

491 ms

pushy.css

pushy.css

490 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

743 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

496 ms

component.css

component.css

500 ms

slidx.js

slidx.js

510 ms

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

987 ms

js

js

70 ms

google_suggest.js

google_suggest.js

732 ms

drop.js

drop.js

818 ms

classie.js

classie.js

818 ms

modalEffects.js

modalEffects.js

820 ms

css

css

24 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

69 ms

back.jpg

back.jpg

1787 ms

logo.png

logo.png

262 ms

arr1.png

arr1.png

263 ms

home-menu.png

home-menu.png

263 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

264 ms

map_ind.png

map_ind.png

459 ms

magnifier.png

magnifier.png

490 ms

blk11.png

blk11.png

491 ms

blk2.png

blk2.png

493 ms

blk3.png

blk3.png

498 ms

blk4.png

blk4.png

702 ms

blk5.png

blk5.png

733 ms

blk6.png

blk6.png

735 ms

redial_red.jpg

redial_red.jpg

3421 ms

f1.png

f1.png

743 ms

t1.png

t1.png

945 ms

g1.png

g1.png

978 ms

i1.png

i1.png

978 ms

y.png

y.png

989 ms

p.png

p.png

1189 ms

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

105 ms

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

110 ms

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

126 ms

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

133 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

16 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

133 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

133 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

common.js

common.js

19 ms

util.js

util.js

37 ms

controls.js

controls.js

56 ms

places_impl.js

places_impl.js

54 ms

Accessibility Review

redial.in accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

redial.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

redial.in SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    X-USER-DEFINED

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redial.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Redial.in main page’s claimed encoding is x-user-defined. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

redial.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Redial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: