3.8 sec in total
288 ms
2.9 sec
587 ms
Welcome to refact.org homepage info - get ready to check Refact best content right away, or after learning these important things about refact.org
In 2001, the REFA chapters in Hartford and Fairfield/Westchester formed the Real Estate Finance Association of Connecticut (REFA-CT).
Visit refact.orgWe analyzed Refact.org page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
refact.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.1 s
64/100
10%
288 ms
32 ms
291 ms
117 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Refact.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Refact.org.
Page size can be reduced by 145.9 kB (7%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Refact.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Refact images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 69.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Refact.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 94% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (6%)
48
45
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Refact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
refact.org
288 ms
css
32 ms
jquery-1.6.1.min.js
291 ms
prettyPhoto.css
117 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
117 ms
SpryTabbedPanels.css
152 ms
SpryTabbedPanels.js
154 ms
buttons.js
42 ms
buttons.js
29 ms
ga.js
71 ms
logo-refa.gif
183 ms
header-bg.gif
127 ms
103019%20-%20pict%201.jpg
2148 ms
regoff.png
128 ms
becoff.png
129 ms
spooff.png
129 ms
vidoff.png
128 ms
mainshadow.gif
129 ms
bullet4-trans.png
194 ms
trans-bullet-invisible.png
205 ms
Carlton%20Fields%20Jorden%20Burt.jpg
206 ms
bg-muted.gif
188 ms
cigna.gif
207 ms
daypitney.gif
207 ms
fidelity.gif
203 ms
firstamerican.gif
206 ms
hart.gif
206 ms
mdmc.gif
246 ms
peoples.gif
247 ms
habitat-for-humanity.gif
245 ms
mutual-housing-assoc.gif
250 ms
bullet3.gif
246 ms
toptext.gif
306 ms
boxleft.gif
306 ms
committee-members.gif
306 ms
boxtopright.gif
306 ms
boxleftmid.gif
308 ms
dottedline172.gif
372 ms
bullet4.gif
372 ms
bullet5.gif
385 ms
boxrightmid.gif
385 ms
boxfooter.gif
383 ms
up.gif
431 ms
upoff.gif
427 ms
vert1.jpg
461 ms
bullet1.jpg
461 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
upon.gif
64 ms
regon.png
61 ms
becon.png
64 ms
spoon.png
63 ms
vidon.png
63 ms
refact.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
refact.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
refact.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Refact.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Refact.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
refact.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Refact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: