1.8 sec in total
88 ms
1.5 sec
255 ms
Visit rel.net now to see the best up-to-date REL content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rel.net
At REL we make powered subwoofer speakers for stereo & home theater systems. Our award-winning home theater subwoofers with wireless capabilities elevate any system. Free shipping on all orders. Offic...
Visit rel.netWe analyzed Rel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rel.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.297
40/100
15%
Value22.6 s
1/100
10%
88 ms
13 ms
18 ms
20 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Rel.net, 30% (25 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to External.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) relates to the external source External.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 333.5 kB (19%)
1.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rel.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. REL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 229.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 229.1 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (70%)
82
25
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of REL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rel.net
88 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
13 ms
pagenavi-css.css
18 ms
style.css
20 ms
stylesheet.css
24 ms
stylesheet.css
27 ms
flexslider.css
25 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
27 ms
jquery.js
34 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
29 ms
jquery.superbgimage.js
30 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
30 ms
jquery.anystretch.min.js
30 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
31 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
55 ms
easing.js
58 ms
jcycle.js
63 ms
touchwipe.js
58 ms
jquery.cookie.js
59 ms
element.js
57 ms
comment-reply.min.js
58 ms
effect.min.js
59 ms
effect-blind.min.js
60 ms
effect-slide.min.js
75 ms
wp-embed.min.js
77 ms
ga.js
14 ms
all.js
12 ms
translateelement.css
120 ms
main.js
263 ms
nav_bg.png
81 ms
nav_arrow.png
85 ms
logo_black.png
82 ms
semi.png
86 ms
footer_bg.png
84 ms
fb-like.png
85 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
287 ms
quattrocentosans-regular-webfont.woff
165 ms
xd_arbiter.php
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
185 ms
ping
155 ms
element_main.js
56 ms
translate_24dp.png
23 ms
l
39 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
13 ms
like_box.php
237 ms
212SE_2Chan_No_Grill_H11.jpg
49 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
47 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
80 ms
yZ--Yu0PDbV.css
54 ms
QD6_ejUFoCN.css
66 ms
xxJgcoj8mOR.css
56 ms
f3zkXvjB9aD.css
54 ms
POxJNRBdVER.css
75 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
90 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
90 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
87 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
87 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
88 ms
1QuX41zDRrx.js
124 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
128 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
133 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
126 ms
DVtj8v6ogQI.js
126 ms
IjqSyiwKeaX.js
127 ms
n6VgtouijQL.js
130 ms
19389_1054460887914821_7866115248636125298_n.jpg
160 ms
safe_image.php
161 ms
123 ms
safe_image.php
60 ms
safe_image.php
60 ms
safe_image.php
374 ms
safe_image.php
59 ms
22203_1054460067914903_7137675817241122542_n.jpg
59 ms
12552522_1191292017565040_2582901646679324842_n.png
61 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
31 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
29 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
29 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
37 ms
Ti_Lifestyle_2_White_Grill.jpg
38 ms
SeriS_H1_Ed6-Home.jpg
11 ms
5.Habitat1_Lifestyle_WallAngle.jpg
11 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
10 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
10 ms
rel.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rel.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rel.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rel.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of REL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: