3 sec in total
431 ms
2.1 sec
431 ms
Click here to check amazing Relative Insight content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about relativeinsight.com
Our AI text analysis software helps research and insight teams understand their audiences by transforming text into quantified insights.
Visit relativeinsight.comWe analyzed Relativeinsight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 431 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
relativeinsight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value480 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
431 ms
148 ms
232 ms
248 ms
245 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Relativeinsight.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (797 ms) relates to the external source A04936b1ada231af862c-4233f4199a778a9ae8f064641b54519c.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 649.5 kB (49%)
1.3 MB
674.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Relativeinsight.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 568.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Relative Insight needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 361.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 361.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Relativeinsight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (60%)
55
22
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Relative Insight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
relativeinsight.com
431 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
148 ms
otw-grid.css
232 ms
general_foundicons.css
248 ms
social_foundicons.css
245 ms
otw_shortcode.css
248 ms
layerslider.css
255 ms
css
66 ms
public.css
251 ms
integrity-light.css
396 ms
integrity-light.css
327 ms
css
76 ms
integrity-light.css
331 ms
addtoany.min.css
336 ms
greensock.js
422 ms
jquery.js
473 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
416 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
495 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
416 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
493 ms
x-head.min.js
572 ms
x-shortcodes-head.min.js
516 ms
css
85 ms
tracker.js
357 ms
x-body.min.js
457 ms
comment-reply.min.js
499 ms
x-shortcodes-body.min.js
503 ms
wp-embed.min.js
534 ms
w.js
274 ms
fbevents.js
163 ms
logo1.png
185 ms
demographics.png
184 ms
Relative-Insight-signs-Havas-helia.jpg
299 ms
Lancaster_university_logo.png
243 ms
saatchiu-amd-saatchi-logo.jpg
373 ms
Next-Big-Thing-at-adtech-London-2015-Relative-Insight.jpg
415 ms
Zurich-University.gif
278 ms
Relative-Insight-awarded-commendation-at-Big-Chip-Awards-2015.png
269 ms
Saatchi.png
413 ms
Microsoft1.png
350 ms
Ogilvy.png
429 ms
Havas.png
383 ms
award2-300x170.jpg
431 ms
ad-tech-london-Next-Big-Thing-2015-300x101.png
455 ms
Fast-Growth-Forum-Audience-Choice-Award-300x111.png
547 ms
Talent-Unleashed-Finalist-2014-300x124.png
581 ms
azR40LUJrT4HaWK28zHmVA.woff
167 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
214 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
215 ms
kAYTUNvBOXlHHqglRQ0Nlg.woff
216 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
216 ms
7DI7Kjvwfuz8m3ExKe6m-Q.woff
215 ms
piwik.js
797 ms
font-awesome.woff
544 ms
ga.js
160 ms
page.js
200 ms
count.js
227 ms
skin.css
366 ms
146 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
169 ms
blank.gif
84 ms
skin.png
83 ms
relativeinsight.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
relativeinsight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
relativeinsight.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Relativeinsight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Relativeinsight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
relativeinsight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Relative Insight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: