3.8 sec in total
562 ms
3.1 sec
144 ms
Click here to check amazing Reliefull content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reliefull.com
「病気でも、要介護でも、自宅で暮らしたい。」リリフルは、そんな皆様の願いを叶えるお手伝いをいたします。看護師・介護士としての豊富な知識と経験、そしてきめ細やかな心配りで、お一人おひとりにあった訪問看護・訪問介護をご提供いたします。
Visit reliefull.comWe analyzed Reliefull.com page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
reliefull.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.13
82/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
562 ms
1052 ms
172 ms
17 ms
332 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Reliefull.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reliefull.com.
Page size can be reduced by 52.3 kB (21%)
248.9 kB
196.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Reliefull.com main page is 248.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 135.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reliefull images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 897 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reliefull.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 897 B or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (19%)
37
30
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reliefull. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reliefull.com
562 ms
www.reliefull.com
1052 ms
styles.css
172 ms
css
17 ms
style.css
332 ms
jquery.js
501 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
347 ms
jquery.form.min.js
343 ms
scripts.js
344 ms
navigation.js
341 ms
fbevents.js
16 ms
logo_main.gif
258 ms
b_contact.gif
255 ms
header_tel.gif
256 ms
menu_back.gif
257 ms
b_top.gif
255 ms
b_feature.gif
254 ms
b_service.gif
334 ms
b_example.gif
333 ms
b_staff.gif
346 ms
top_main_back.jpg
684 ms
b_top_service.png
514 ms
h_top_recruit.png
344 ms
b_top_recruit.png
660 ms
hc_back.gif
663 ms
b_ex1.gif
687 ms
b_ex2.gif
684 ms
b_ex3.gif
692 ms
footer_back.gif
827 ms
footer_contact_back.gif
829 ms
h_footer_contact.gif
854 ms
footer_tel.gif
857 ms
footer_mail.gif
857 ms
footer_contact.gif
865 ms
logo_mini.gif
993 ms
arrow_mini.gif
995 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
collect
30 ms
js
65 ms
reliefull.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
reliefull.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reliefull.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reliefull.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reliefull.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reliefull.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reliefull. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: