2.8 sec in total
199 ms
1.6 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to remarks.rubberstamps.com homepage info - get ready to check Re Marks Rubber Stamps best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about remarks.rubberstamps.com
Return address stamps add a creative and personalized touch to all your mail. Choose from a variety of template designs to get exactly the look you want.
Visit remarks.rubberstamps.comWe analyzed Remarks.rubberstamps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
remarks.rubberstamps.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value2,010 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.084
93/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
199 ms
162 ms
40 ms
42 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Remarks.rubberstamps.com, 49% (33 requests) were made to Rubberstamps.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Va.content.lpsnmedia.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (755 ms) relates to the external source Rubberstamps.com.
Page size can be reduced by 507.0 kB (31%)
1.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Remarks.rubberstamps.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 990.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Marks Rubber Stamps images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remarks.rubberstamps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (40%)
58
35
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Marks Rubber Stamps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
remarks.rubberstamps.com
199 ms
162 ms
css
40 ms
css
42 ms
css
58 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
jquery-ui.css
41 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
109 ms
bootstrap.min.css
187 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
161 ms
styles.css
161 ms
bootstrap.min.js
196 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js
153 ms
common.js
146 ms
WebResource.axd
159 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
187 ms
webresource.axd
81 ms
telerik.web.ui.webresource.axd
83 ms
analytics.js
36 ms
remarks_pattern_sm.png
121 ms
bannerrs.png
103 ms
bannerremarks.png
103 ms
bannerredsite.png
118 ms
bannerblog.png
69 ms
remarks_logo.jpg
145 ms
rslogo.png
118 ms
stamp-banner.jpg
408 ms
embosser-banner.jpg
405 ms
inkacc.jpg
330 ms
featured-stamp.jpg
219 ms
embosser.jpg
755 ms
featured-gift.jpg
254 ms
blog.jpg
259 ms
ReMarks-intro-GIFA.jpg
291 ms
fb.jpg
294 ms
twitter.jpg
326 ms
camera.jpg
342 ms
pinterest.jpg
383 ms
wp.jpg
384 ms
collect
63 ms
collect
107 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
65 ms
tag.js
84 ms
sdk.js
178 ms
6dUc_M1PDZZCBfdFvQn4lQ.ttf
13 ms
fKnfV28XkldRW297cFLeqfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
27 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
228 ms
ga-audiences
42 ms
.jsonp
129 ms
50 ms
xd_arbiter.php
126 ms
xd_arbiter.php
314 ms
mTag.js
139 ms
118 ms
98 ms
42 ms
toaster_stripes_light_grad_s.png
169 ms
female1a.png
179 ms
bubble.png
188 ms
default221X86.gif
189 ms
65 ms
print.css
80 ms
rschatlogo.jpg
103 ms
button_grad_40_soft.png
117 ms
close.png
131 ms
confused.png
164 ms
logoImage.png
139 ms
32 ms
remarks.rubberstamps.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
remarks.rubberstamps.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
remarks.rubberstamps.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remarks.rubberstamps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remarks.rubberstamps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remarks.rubberstamps.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Marks Rubber Stamps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: