Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

remoskop.ru

Ремонт квартиры своими руками и строительство дома - Видео, советы, справочник

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

612 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

509 ms

remoskop.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit remoskop.ru now to see the best up-to-date Remoskop content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remoskop.ru

Видео, мастер-классы, фото, справочник и советы мастеров в нашей Школе ремонта. Как своими руками построить дом или сделать ремонт в квартире?

Visit remoskop.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Remoskop.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 612 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remoskop.ru performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30,030 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

remoskop.ru

612 ms

A.style.css.pagespeed.cf.eGIkOXg_bi.css

995 ms

css

50 ms

A.basic.css,qver=2.3.2.2.pagespeed.cf.ziDxZ1USG9.css

699 ms

A.lightbox.min.ru_RU.css,qver=1.3.4.pagespeed.cf.5cGvPNJVZ1.css

490 ms

Our browser made a total of 267 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (241 requests) were addressed to the original Remoskop.ru, 1% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 1% (4 requests) were made to Cackle.me. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) belongs to the original domain Remoskop.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 418.2 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

825.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Remoskop.ru main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 552.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 163.8 kB

  • Original 200.1 kB
  • After minification 197.8 kB
  • After compression 36.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 552.4 kB
  • After minification 547.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remoskop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 154.0 kB

  • Original 344.4 kB
  • After minification 342.4 kB
  • After compression 190.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.0 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 95.9 kB

  • Original 146.6 kB
  • After minification 146.2 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remoskop.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 173 (66%)

Requests Now

261

After Optimization

88

The browser has sent 261 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remoskop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

remoskop.ru accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

remoskop.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

remoskop.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remoskop.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remoskop.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remoskop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: