2.7 sec in total
209 ms
2 sec
466 ms
Click here to check amazing Remote content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about remote.team
A tool with an integrated task management system: privacy setting, project management using tags, guest access, 24/7 support, Live Support for your website
Visit remote.teamWe analyzed Remote.team page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
remote.team performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value2.8 s
82/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
209 ms
471 ms
329 ms
127 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Remote.team, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Remote.team.
Page size can be reduced by 128.6 kB (73%)
177.2 kB
48.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Remote.team main page is 177.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 156.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
23
23
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
remote.team
209 ms
remote.team
471 ms
329 ms
js
127 ms
app.ce99018f.js
156 ms
laptop_main_en.svg
764 ms
laptop_notif_en.svg
952 ms
stars-4.5.svg
314 ms
trustpilot.webp
313 ms
arrow-circle-left.svg
318 ms
stars-5.svg
316 ms
stars-1.svg
405 ms
arrow-circle-right.svg
403 ms
live-chat_en.webp
499 ms
img1.68312ebb.webp
500 ms
img2.1c211df1.webp
499 ms
img3.c9fbb782.webp
675 ms
img4.38f7972f.webp
585 ms
img5.4b03f3b1.webp
586 ms
si_linkedin.webp
586 ms
si_twitter.webp
678 ms
si_reddit.webp
677 ms
si_instagram.webp
676 ms
latoregular.1fbf86c9.woff
901 ms
latobold.7ff99161.woff
900 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
collect
26 ms
collect
45 ms
remote.team accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
remote.team best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
remote.team SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remote.team can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remote.team main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remote.team
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remote. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: