1.8 sec in total
244 ms
995 ms
532 ms
Visit remoteflight.net now to see the best up-to-date Remote Flight content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remoteflight.net
RemoteFlight - Flight Simulator (FS2020, FSX, FS9), Prepar3d and X-Plane gauges for iPhone, iPad and other Apple devices
Visit remoteflight.netWe analyzed Remoteflight.net page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
remoteflight.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value4,520 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.158
74/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
244 ms
113 ms
32 ms
26 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Remoteflight.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to D3932137p5ikt7.cloudfront.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (541 ms) belongs to the original domain Remoteflight.net.
Page size can be reduced by 182.2 kB (11%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Remoteflight.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remote Flight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remoteflight.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (33%)
54
36
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote Flight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
remoteflight.net
244 ms
prettyPhoto.css
113 ms
rf2.css
32 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
26 ms
cookies.css
44 ms
slim-081711.css
16 ms
rf2.js
108 ms
jquery-min.js
43 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
56 ms
css2
36 ms
loader.min.js
8 ms
gtm.js
123 ms
page_bg.jpg
193 ms
all.js
52 ms
fbevents.js
54 ms
title.png
126 ms
product_bg.png
140 ms
title_image_TRQ.png
127 ms
title_RF.png
127 ms
title_TRQ.png
125 ms
btn_product_page.png
279 ms
product_divider.png
280 ms
title_image_GLASS.png
281 ms
title_GLASS.png
277 ms
title_image_COCKPITHD.png
286 ms
title_COCKPITHD.png
216 ms
title_image_RADIOHD.png
303 ms
title_RADIOHD.png
316 ms
title_image_MAPHD.png
399 ms
title_MAPHD.png
370 ms
title_image_AP.png
392 ms
title_AP.png
322 ms
title_image_HSI.png
378 ms
title_HSI.png
411 ms
title_image_MAP.png
430 ms
title_MAP.png
474 ms
title_image_COMM.png
455 ms
title_COMM.png
443 ms
title_image_NAV.png
483 ms
title_NAV.png
506 ms
bottom_menu_bg.png
472 ms
btn_download.png
541 ms
footer_bg.png
492 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTajNp8A.ttf
76 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT6jRp8A.ttf
176 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTtDRp8A.ttf
288 ms
all.js
67 ms
1655385308054948
184 ms
script_async.min.js
26 ms
analytics.js
69 ms
jquery.min.js
27 ms
176 ms
script.css
96 ms
sb-logo-black-large-bcd86f365126cf60f26bfd7f30304af6.png
63 ms
collect
17 ms
collect
30 ms
ga-audiences
72 ms
en-btn-right.png
57 ms
dark-bottom.css
10 ms
remoteflight.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
remoteflight.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
remoteflight.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remoteflight.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remoteflight.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remoteflight.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remote Flight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: