17.1 sec in total
201 ms
16.7 sec
197 ms
Visit remotekit.net now to see the best up-to-date Remotekit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remotekit.net
77779193永利█注册就送█注册(开户)就送88彩金⚽官网包含:体育,真人,棋牌,电竞,电玩,足彩,福彩,比分.★24*7在线客服很高兴为您服务,至尊享受。
Visit remotekit.netWe analyzed Remotekit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 16.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
remotekit.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value2.166
0/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
201 ms
1554 ms
70 ms
1121 ms
1212 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Remotekit.net, 54% (25 requests) were made to Mylf888.com and 24% (11 requests) were made to Sxy.sxdtdx.edu.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.
Page size can be reduced by 33.6 kB (4%)
769.8 kB
736.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Remotekit.net main page is 769.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 745.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remotekit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 816 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 816 B or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remotekit.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82 B or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (22%)
32
25
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remotekit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
remotekit.net
201 ms
www.remotekit.net
1554 ms
jquery.20.min.js
70 ms
style.css
1121 ms
jquery1.42.min.js
1212 ms
jquery.SuperSlide.2.1.3.js
1161 ms
tj.js
1414 ms
jquery.la.min.js
182 ms
pp.js
306 ms
da5bc0d47d.png
4375 ms
70b658ec22.jpg
5099 ms
shuxuetongji.png
5089 ms
logo_L.png
5082 ms
30f6a9de3b.jpg
5090 ms
slider-arrow.png
5072 ms
6bf403cb49.jpg
4290 ms
8d83d8f893.png
4286 ms
b65d7b1683.png
4278 ms
361f387984.jpg
4273 ms
21653089.js
12014 ms
ghs.png
4226 ms
indexyl.html
306 ms
zhongguomeng.js
69 ms
index.css
137 ms
jquery.la.min.js
210 ms
yongli2021.gif
279 ms
blakimg.jpg
276 ms
1000x100.js.gif
413 ms
bet365365.jpg
412 ms
wns111.gif
482 ms
ty100.jpg
412 ms
xpj999.gif
553 ms
xintyc.gif
755 ms
kaiyun100.jpg
547 ms
mgm1000x100_jpg.jpg
619 ms
bwin1000.gif
482 ms
daohang.gif
551 ms
jinsha168.jpg
552 ms
wnsr168.gif
616 ms
xpj168.gif
620 ms
tyc168.jpg
620 ms
365bet168.jpg
620 ms
ky.jpg
683 ms
yongli168.jpg
687 ms
mgm120.jpg
688 ms
ftimg.jpg
689 ms
remotekit.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
remotekit.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
remotekit.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remotekit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remotekit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remotekit.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remotekit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: