Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

remoteseoteam.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

remoteseoteam.com screenshot

About Website

Visit remoteseoteam.com now to see the best up-to-date Remoteseoteam content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about remoteseoteam.com

Visit remoteseoteam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Remoteseoteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remoteseoteam.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

remoteseoteam.com

141 ms

style.css

180 ms

theme-cs-portfolio.css

96 ms

css

25 ms

jquery.js

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Remoteseoteam.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (817 ms) belongs to the original domain Remoteseoteam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 450.4 kB (14%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Remoteseoteam.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 42.0 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 142.8 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remoteseoteam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 153.0 kB

  • Original 270.9 kB
  • After minification 245.4 kB
  • After compression 117.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 141.6 kB
  • After minification 105.4 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remoteseoteam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (45%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remoteseoteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

remoteseoteam.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remoteseoteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remoteseoteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remoteseoteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: