5.3 sec in total
834 ms
3.8 sec
625 ms
Visit restyle.com now to see the best up-to-date Restyle content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about restyle.com
Restyle is the smart way that corporate America buys furniture. We can fulfill your vision for the space at 1/2 the cost of new, in 1/3 of the time!
Visit restyle.comWe analyzed Restyle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 834 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
restyle.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.218
57/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
834 ms
159 ms
148 ms
156 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Restyle.com, 12% (16 requests) were made to Preownedoptions.com and 9% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Restyle.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (20%)
8.7 MB
7.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Restyle.com main page is 8.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Restyle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 920.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 920.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 510.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Restyle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 510.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (70%)
117
35
The browser has sent 117 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Restyle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.restyle.com
834 ms
style.css
159 ms
skeleton-responsive.css
148 ms
layout-responsive.css
156 ms
style-custom.css
160 ms
css
23 ms
styles.css
152 ms
jquery.qtip.css
146 ms
default.css
165 ms
nggallery.css
174 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
176 ms
easy-twitter-feed-widget.css
244 ms
superfish.css
244 ms
prettyPhoto.css
253 ms
flexslider.css
251 ms
jquery.js
387 ms
jquery-migrate.js
256 ms
iphorm.js
316 ms
swfupload.js
343 ms
swfobject.js
335 ms
swfupload.swfobject.js
339 ms
swfupload.queue.js
344 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
411 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
414 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
416 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
417 ms
jquery.iphorm.js
361 ms
jquery.form.js
449 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
448 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
530 ms
jquery.uniform.js
488 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min.js
487 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js
487 ms
superfish.js
528 ms
supersub.js
529 ms
hoverIntent.js
566 ms
gdl-scripts.js
553 ms
jquery.easing.js
548 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
544 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
539 ms
pattern-1.png
493 ms
ga.js
33 ms
Used-Office-Furniture-Executive-Office-Furniture-Office-Furniture-Maryland-Office-Furniture-Washington-DC-Office-Furniture-Virginia-Baltimore-Maryland.png
325 ms
linkedin.png
467 ms
twitter.png
324 ms
youtube.png
325 ms
google-plus.png
466 ms
email.png
611 ms
Commercial-Office-Furniture-980x360.png
1380 ms
Architects-and-Interior-Designers-980x360.png
1317 ms
Used-Office-Furniture-PROJECTS-980x360.png
1440 ms
Office-Furniture-Catalogue-980x360.png
1269 ms
Restyle-Furniture-Maximum-Value-Process-980x360.png
1440 ms
LEED-Green-Building-Recycled-Furniture-980x360.png
1547 ms
Restyle-Furniture-Blog-980x360.png
1625 ms
used-commercial-furniture-used-furniture-commercial-furniture-commercial-office-furniture-contract-office-furniture-office-interiors.png
1698 ms
architectural-office-interiors-commercial-office-interior-design-contemporary-office-interior-design-office-architects-office-furniture-designs.png
1701 ms
Commercial-Office-Furniture-Used-Office-Furniture-Professional-Office-Furniture-Maryland-Washington-DC-Virginia-office-furniture-catalogue-office-interior-design-2-of-6.jpg
1821 ms
Executive-Office-Furniture-Commercial-Office-Furniture-Used-Office-Furniture-Maryland-Washington-DC-Virginia-office-furniture-catalogue-office-design-3-of-5.jpg
1710 ms
Commercial-Office-Furniture-Used-Office-Furniture-Professional-Office-Furniture-boardroom-table-conference-tables-Virginia-460x180.png
1620 ms
www.preownedoptions.com
167 ms
gradient-top-gray-40px.png
1673 ms
find-17px.png
1673 ms
gradient-vertical-6px.png
1740 ms
calendar.png
1740 ms
comment.png
1674 ms
UZqW8DZ0-DA
224 ms
gradient-top4-32px.png
1654 ms
__utm.gif
312 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
134 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
167 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
309 ms
cj2hUnSRBhwmSPr9kS589-LrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf
310 ms
c92rD_x0V1LslSFt3-QEpmsGzsqhEorxQDpu60nfWEc.ttf
310 ms
css
145 ms
textshadow.css
145 ms
isotope.min.css
144 ms
aa3d76765d57.css
144 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
102 ms
mootools-yui-compressed.js
110 ms
855137a7cad6.js
238 ms
conklin_products.js
288 ms
f92dfa43a716.js
304 ms
isotope.min.js
288 ms
swipe.min.js
288 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
322 ms
fb7ed9ecd547.js
288 ms
mediabox.js
301 ms
tablesort.js
320 ms
colorbox.min.js
320 ms
widgets.js
415 ms
bg_control_nav_custom.png
1500 ms
bg_direction_nav_custom.png
1556 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
301 ms
www-embed-player.js
372 ms
base.js
443 ms
56567363
284 ms
iconSearchbutton.png
126 ms
sidenavArrow.png
126 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
71 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
71 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
70 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
72 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
280 ms
player.js
293 ms
player.css
249 ms
ga.js
185 ms
vuid.min.js
248 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
138 ms
ad_status.js
138 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
124 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
216 ms
__utm.gif
62 ms
syndication
232 ms
344713329262084096
243 ms
proxy.html
91 ms
391690732.jpg
115 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
45 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.dark.ltr.css
54 ms
Restyle_Avatar_normal.png
168 ms
jot
30 ms
pd.js
10 ms
file-upload-tick.png
78 ms
captcha-refresh-icon.png
77 ms
default-loading.gif
78 ms
error.png
79 ms
success.png
79 ms
analytics
214 ms
restyle.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
restyle.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
restyle.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Restyle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Restyle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
restyle.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Restyle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: