1.9 sec in total
149 ms
1.7 sec
145 ms
Welcome to resultsmail.com homepage info - get ready to check Results Mail best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about resultsmail.com
Email marketing services that deliver real results from email marketing campaigns.
Visit resultsmail.comWe analyzed Resultsmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
resultsmail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.05
99/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
149 ms
285 ms
136 ms
265 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Resultsmail.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (510 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.segment.com.
Page size can be reduced by 333.6 kB (42%)
800.8 kB
467.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Resultsmail.com main page is 800.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 586.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Results Mail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 263.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 263.5 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultsmail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (54%)
50
23
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Results Mail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
resultsmail.com
149 ms
resultsmail.com
285 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.13.custom.css
136 ms
resultsmail.css
265 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
333 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.13.custom.min.js
469 ms
iepngfix_tilebg.js
201 ms
emailCheck.js
202 ms
mainScripts.js
203 ms
pkc8ayh.js
154 ms
signUpForm.js
267 ms
swfobject.js
269 ms
trackjs.js
355 ms
rmNew1.css
270 ms
api.js
36 ms
analytics.min.js
510 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
header_bg.png
82 ms
logo.png
82 ms
feature_bg.png
82 ms
girlDesk230.jpg
81 ms
input_bg.png
82 ms
btn_bg.png
81 ms
create-email.png
166 ms
deliver-email96.png
165 ms
measure-email.png
166 ms
obama80.png
166 ms
ford110.png
165 ms
huckabee.png
165 ms
fourseasons.png
295 ms
raytheon120.png
293 ms
stregis60b.png
294 ms
lexmark100.png
294 ms
content_bg.png
279 ms
customers_bg.png
279 ms
footer_bg.png
345 ms
twitter_icon.png
346 ms
facebook_icon.png
349 ms
googleplus_icon.png
347 ms
blogger_icon.png
345 ms
recaptcha__en.js
96 ms
track.php
372 ms
1011.js
68 ms
d
33 ms
d
64 ms
d
55 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
95 ms
js
111 ms
p.gif
87 ms
fallback
24 ms
ga-audiences
103 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
css
105 ms
logo_48.png
3 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
22 ms
get_affinfo.php
308 ms
polyfill.min.js
52 ms
resultsmail.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
resultsmail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
resultsmail.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultsmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Resultsmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
resultsmail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Results Mail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: