Tools & Wizards About Us
reversegaze.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

reversegaze.net

reversegaze

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

500 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

235 ms

reversegaze.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reversegaze.net homepage info - get ready to check Reversegaze best content right away, or after learning these important things about reversegaze.net

Visit reversegaze.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Reversegaze.net page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reversegaze.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.reversegaze.net

500 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

199 ms

main.min.css

318 ms

css

26 ms

bootstrap.css

498 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Reversegaze.net, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (762 ms) belongs to the original domain Reversegaze.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.7 kB (79%)

Content Size

23.7 kB

After Optimization

5.0 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Reversegaze.net main page is 23.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 23.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (72%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reversegaze. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.reversegaze.net

www.reversegaze.net

500 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

199 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

318 ms

css

css

26 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

498 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

213 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

224 ms

jquery.vegas.min.css

jquery.vegas.min.css

222 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

332 ms

pixeden-icons.css

pixeden-icons.css

296 ms

style.css

style.css

584 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

320 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

762 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

490 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

427 ms

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

374 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

462 ms

jquery.knob.js

jquery.knob.js

593 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

512 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

519 ms

jquery.vegas.min.js

jquery.vegas.min.js

545 ms

scrollReveal.js

scrollReveal.js

599 ms

zerif.js

zerif.js

624 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

605 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

628 ms

css

css

14 ms

Reversegaze-NYcity.jpg

Reversegaze-NYcity.jpg

543 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

97 ms

Reversegaze1.jpg

Reversegaze1.jpg

183 ms

Resized-7F2PR.jpg

Resized-7F2PR.jpg

115 ms

map25-redish.png

map25-redish.png

93 ms

envelope4-green.png

envelope4-green.png

94 ms

telephone65-blue.png

telephone65-blue.png

178 ms

1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff

1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff

11 ms

kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff

kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff

16 ms

I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff

I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff

26 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff

33 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

291 ms

SEO Factors

reversegaze.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reversegaze.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reversegaze.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reversegaze.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reversegaze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: