13.9 sec in total
5.1 sec
7.8 sec
951 ms
Welcome to reviewofweb.com homepage info - get ready to check Review Of Web best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about reviewofweb.com
Make the most of technology
Visit reviewofweb.comWe analyzed Reviewofweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.1 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
reviewofweb.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value2,690 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
5127 ms
53 ms
76 ms
78 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewofweb.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (7 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewofweb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 373.3 kB (34%)
1.1 MB
724.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewofweb.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 621.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Of Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 194.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 194.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewofweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (58%)
74
31
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Of Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewofweb.com
5127 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
53 ms
cnss.css
76 ms
styles.css
78 ms
css
70 ms
genericons.css
110 ms
style.css
128 ms
jquery.js
144 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
89 ms
cnss.js
120 ms
jquery-cookie.js
142 ms
adsbygoogle.js
29 ms
wps.css
236 ms
countdown.css
244 ms
color-7.css
244 ms
jquery.simplemodal.1.4.4.min.js
249 ms
jquery.lwtCountdown-1.0.js
250 ms
core.min.js
295 ms
widget.min.js
250 ms
mouse.min.js
276 ms
sortable.min.js
298 ms
jquery.form.min.js
298 ms
scripts.js
277 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
313 ms
functions.js
312 ms
wp-embed.min.js
315 ms
analytics.js
104 ms
ba162abb2942f777b1c1851d59b68634
95 ms
rssymbol.jpg
2542 ms
ROWReview.png
432 ms
what-is-cdn.png
472 ms
codespaces.jpg
541 ms
planmyjourney.png
432 ms
newidentity.png
432 ms
irctccustomfield.jpg
461 ms
irctcpassengerdetails.png
586 ms
custompassengerdetails.png
518 ms
wp-seo-tips1.jpg
541 ms
ca-pub-6437637249504636.js
79 ms
zrt_lookup.html
364 ms
show_ads_impl.js
322 ms
bg-1-7.png
511 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9hsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
380 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPUnwhEOjQ2CQgMjdTKA0dzI.woff
410 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ1xa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
435 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
456 ms
Genericons.svg
487 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
23 ms
HQXBIwLHsOJCNEQeX9kNzxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
455 ms
Wreg0Be4tcFGM2t6VWytvBGYIVA-f1n-gQW6IKoy_-M.woff
454 ms
collect
337 ms
likebox.php
479 ms
x.png
197 ms
name-7.png
206 ms
email-7.png
207 ms
submit-7.png
226 ms
ads
321 ms
osd.js
8 ms
FbUd6dZS1Af.css
308 ms
dGJLq38YL-C.css
375 ms
Vqr3k1iJZIS.js
509 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
642 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
524 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
524 ms
7005638802955493131
23 ms
abg.js
32 ms
m_js_controller.js
43 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
82 ms
x_button_blue2.png
5 ms
s
31 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
4 ms
314615_259960007372435_1945544222_n.jpg
55 ms
11703371_101032280248295_8975971970678579827_n.jpg
56 ms
11206059_1557039581223563_3823425587675052471_n.jpg
55 ms
12313545_475710932589706_4353282771750923836_n.jpg
55 ms
184151_165289763519882_5093458_n.jpg
55 ms
12219320_141619079531289_6403106119866870261_n.jpg
56 ms
12650947_852844451490752_2149960888855298710_n.jpg
55 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
82 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
83 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
135 ms
reviewofweb.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reviewofweb.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
reviewofweb.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewofweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewofweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewofweb.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Of Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: