3.2 sec in total
113 ms
1 sec
2 sec
Click here to check amazing Reviews Up content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviews-up.com
Promote your App right now➤➤➤ Get real app reviews, ratings and installs on reviews-up.com for $1,6 to raise you apps to the Top List ❶ No Bots!
Visit reviews-up.comWe analyzed Reviews-up.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
reviews-up.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
91/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value470 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
113 ms
268 ms
132 ms
55 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Reviews-up.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (508 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviews-up.com.
Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (46%)
294.1 kB
159.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviews-up.com main page is 294.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 160.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviews Up images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (63%)
32
12
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviews Up. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviews-up.com
113 ms
reviews-up.com
268 ms
news-min.css
132 ms
slick.min.css
55 ms
slick-theme.min.css
54 ms
email-decode.min.js
43 ms
jquery.min.js
51 ms
slick.min.js
54 ms
DMCABadgeHelper.min.js
50 ms
autoptimize_012a3e2df88e31072040fbce137c9ec2.js
144 ms
css
68 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
97 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
106 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
127 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
141 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
143 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
196 ms
header-nav-bg-min.jpg
237 ms
bg2-min.jpg
240 ms
android.png
241 ms
apple.png
237 ms
home__benefits-bg-min.png
290 ms
best-sellers-bg-min.png
305 ms
green-rects.png
309 ms
green-rev.png
315 ms
android-color.png
311 ms
green-inst.png
362 ms
blue-rects.png
391 ms
blue-rev.png
409 ms
apple-color.png
409 ms
blue-inst.png
396 ms
skobkaa-start.png
414 ms
skobkaa-end.png
460 ms
violet-bg.jpg
493 ms
ic_mail-min.png
498 ms
ic_skype-min.png
508 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
35 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7w.woff
5 ms
reviews-up.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reviews-up.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
reviews-up.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviews-up.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviews-up.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviews-up.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reviews Up. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: