4.7 sec in total
390 ms
3.8 sec
501 ms
Welcome to revuewm.com homepage info - get ready to check Revuewm best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about revuewm.com
Revue
Visit revuewm.comWe analyzed Revuewm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 390 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
revuewm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value3,440 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.229
54/100
15%
Value28.9 s
0/100
10%
390 ms
86 ms
150 ms
149 ms
146 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Revuewm.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Revuewm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 229.7 kB (11%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Revuewm.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.6 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Revuewm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 71.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revuewm.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (56%)
85
37
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Revuewm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
revuewm.com
390 ms
simple-line-icons.css
86 ms
k2.css
150 ms
content.css
149 ms
rokbox.css
146 ms
showcase.css
160 ms
nucleus.css
188 ms
xenon_12.css
222 ms
bootstrap-gantry.css
269 ms
joomla.css
262 ms
icomoon.css
260 ms
font-awesome5-all.min.css
249 ms
font-awesome5-shim.min.css
342 ms
xenon-joomla_12.css
373 ms
custom_12.css
393 ms
engine-revue.css
401 ms
jquery.min.js
440 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
432 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
438 ms
k2.frontend.js
478 ms
bootstrap.min.js
491 ms
core.js
495 ms
mootools-core.js
514 ms
mootools-more.js
581 ms
rokbox.js
653 ms
mootools-mobile.js
667 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
653 ms
roksprocket.js
659 ms
moofx.js
656 ms
features.js
743 ms
showcase.js
681 ms
js
145 ms
engine.js
671 ms
gpt.js
128 ms
adsbygoogle.js
182 ms
sharethis.js
119 ms
api.js
119 ms
widgets.js
179 ms
main.js
691 ms
BOTW.js
717 ms
css
129 ms
fbevents.js
232 ms
logo.png
907 ms
679aa550c461b354cef4c5f72fe8c7ab_XL.jpg
1582 ms
df5c103d684de73fb06b5a1cedf6d0f9_M.jpg
974 ms
0f9ee1de0328bf4e6a9035a0929256bb_M.jpg
938 ms
d2d2e82a9f9294a9667957da3d627141_M.jpg
938 ms
8bd452a553c35083d5b88caa23593528_M.jpg
937 ms
5f3815ee8e71865999021ea5cce287ab_M.jpg
1580 ms
08c66898c92aae9fec702515eb9dc8e6_M.jpg
1578 ms
a36bd3adf7c017ff99a051ad4c462e29_M.jpg
1578 ms
2aebb15d1e90453d9af2bff2d0d03145_M.jpg
1571 ms
2aedc634fe7e26bfc4147a003d49f844_M.jpg
1675 ms
39e9de352ea07f1e7c56e22053aaaf61_M.jpg
1732 ms
8d599783992cbe12c89cf3c53cdde8ee_M.jpg
1731 ms
43247b3b09313b3df18c7f725f777e75_M.jpg
1752 ms
c5add3f5788e9bfe56bb6dfbdde56303_M.jpg
1694 ms
Revue-Podcast-BoxAd.jpg
1756 ms
facebook-icon.png
1755 ms
instagram-icon-1.png
1810 ms
youtube-icon.png
1844 ms
Revue-FlipThrough-BOX-Sept22.jpg
1870 ms
pubads_impl_2022092701.js
238 ms
ppub_config
471 ms
analytics.js
738 ms
629725781161269
650 ms
roboto-bold-webfont.woff
1611 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.woff
1679 ms
recaptcha__en.js
963 ms
integrator.js
1016 ms
ads
578 ms
ads
578 ms
ads
1073 ms
ads
580 ms
container.html
711 ms
collect
475 ms
revuewm.com
954 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
625 ms
4428752245574578934
251 ms
abg_lite.js
253 ms
window_focus.js
285 ms
icon.png
689 ms
10306703610636637489
245 ms
collect
61 ms
ga-audiences
24 ms
8135052198110964395
71 ms
icon.png
79 ms
qs_click_protection.js
70 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
76 ms
s
140 ms
redir.html
155 ms
revuewm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
revuewm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
revuewm.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revuewm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Revuewm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
revuewm.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Revuewm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: