Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

rewardscompared.com

快三app登录-智库百科

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

307 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

449 ms

rewardscompared.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rewardscompared.com homepage info - get ready to check Rewardscompared best content right away, or after learning these important things about rewardscompared.com

快三app登录是拥有强大互联网基础的领先AI公司。是全球为数不多的提供AI芯片、软件架构和应用程序等全栈AI技术的公司之一,被国际机构评为全球四大AI公司之一。百度以“用科技让复杂的世界更简单”为使命,坚持技术创新,致力于“成为最懂用户,并能帮助人们成长的全球顶级高科技公司”。

Visit rewardscompared.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rewardscompared.com page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rewardscompared.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,110 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rewardscompared.com

307 ms

style.css

94 ms

style.css

100 ms

featureCarousel.css

101 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rewardscompared.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (400 ms) belongs to the original domain Rewardscompared.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.6 kB (47%)

Content Size

494.1 kB

After Optimization

259.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Rewardscompared.com main page is 494.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 293.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 122.3 kB
  • After minification 120.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rewardscompared images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 170.2 kB

  • Original 293.8 kB
  • After minification 245.0 kB
  • After compression 123.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 49.5 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rewardscompared.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (50%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rewardscompared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rewardscompared.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rewardscompared.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rewardscompared.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rewardscompared.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rewardscompared.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rewardscompared. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: