Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

rf1.net

Home, Multi-functional software for everyone! [RF1 Systems]

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

567 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

311 ms

rf1.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RF1 content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rf1.net

Multi-functional software for everyone!

Visit rf1.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rf1.net page load time and found that the first response time was 567 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rf1.net performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rf1.net

567 ms

show_ads.js

8 ms

logo4.png

265 ms

bg2.jpg

264 ms

blank.gif

262 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Rf1.net, 15% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 12% (4 requests) were made to Freewareseek.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (567 ms) belongs to the original domain Rf1.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.5 kB (29%)

Content Size

230.3 kB

After Optimization

162.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rf1.net main page is 230.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 154.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 43.4 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 154.0 kB
  • After minification 136.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RF1 needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 25.2 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (42%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RF1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rf1.net accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rf1.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rf1.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rf1.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rf1.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RF1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: