3 sec in total
294 ms
2.2 sec
483 ms
Welcome to rgf.be homepage info - get ready to check RGF best content for Belgium right away, or after learning these important things about rgf.be
Actif depuis 2001, RGF est un organisme indépendant spécialisé dans le marché de l'épargne, de l'investissement, du crédit et de l'assurance.
Visit rgf.beWe analyzed Rgf.be page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rgf.be performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
294 ms
622 ms
482 ms
180 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Rgf.be, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (767 ms) belongs to the original domain Rgf.be.
Page size can be reduced by 247.4 kB (39%)
630.7 kB
383.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rgf.be main page is 630.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 302.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RGF images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgf.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (65%)
55
19
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RGF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rgf.be
294 ms
www.rgf.be
622 ms
jquery.js
482 ms
jquery.easySlider.js
180 ms
jquery.easySlider.css
213 ms
jquery.biggerlink.js
197 ms
jquery.nyroModal.js
408 ms
jquery.nyroModal.css
257 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
271 ms
jquery.tooltip.css
291 ms
default.js
304 ms
jquery.cookie.js
343 ms
jquery-ui-personalized.js
444 ms
jquery.tabs.css
382 ms
jquery.rating.js
391 ms
jquery.rating.css
432 ms
jquery.maxlength.js
468 ms
jquery.jqzoom.js
490 ms
jquery.jqzoom.css
494 ms
jquery.toggleMenu.js
517 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
529 ms
jquery.nivoSlider.css
555 ms
jquery.customer.js
553 ms
reset.css
570 ms
default.css
581 ms
forms.css
607 ms
typography.css
618 ms
print.css
631 ms
customer.css
648 ms
colors.css
653 ms
Default.css
665 ms
Default.css
697 ms
Default.css
707 ms
Default.css
717 ms
Default.css
736 ms
WebResource.axd
678 ms
ga.js
5 ms
ScriptResource.axd
767 ms
conversion.js
16 ms
ScriptResource.axd
638 ms
bg_body.gif
166 ms
logo.png
107 ms
logoPages.png
167 ms
259.jpg
713 ms
man.jpg
388 ms
graphic-en.jpg
255 ms
signature.jpg
183 ms
JSSessionHandler.ashx
224 ms
bg_header.gif
129 ms
facebook-icon.png
171 ms
bg_page.gif
210 ms
separator.jpg
384 ms
shadow-table-top.jpg
249 ms
shadow-table-bottom.jpg
256 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
56 ms
puce_h3.gif
244 ms
65 ms
rgf.be accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rgf.be best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rgf.be SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgf.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rgf.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rgf.be
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RGF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: