11.5 sec in total
897 ms
10.4 sec
197 ms
Visit rgr-toe.ru now to see the best up-to-date Rgr Toe content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rgr-toe.ru
Решение задач по ТОЭ. Решение ТОЭ
Visit rgr-toe.ruWe analyzed Rgr-toe.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 897 ms and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
rgr-toe.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.115
86/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
897 ms
92 ms
259 ms
251 ms
316 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rgr-toe.ru, 9% (9 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 6% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Front.facetz.net.
Page size can be reduced by 441.0 kB (61%)
726.9 kB
285.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rgr-toe.ru main page is 726.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 550.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rgr Toe needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 311.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 311.0 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgr-toe.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (77%)
90
21
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rgr Toe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rgr-toe.ru
897 ms
MathJax.js
92 ms
jquery.js
259 ms
style.css
251 ms
style.css
316 ms
hostcms.js
282 ms
JsHttpRequest.js
282 ms
ajax.js
282 ms
main.js
377 ms
style.css
384 ms
jquery.lightbox.js
389 ms
jquery.lightbox.css
392 ms
share.js
14 ms
zp.js
705 ms
zp.js
710 ms
adsbygoogle.js
14 ms
watch.js
174 ms
top100.jcn
373 ms
MML_HTMLorMML.js
13 ms
watch.js
478 ms
ajax_loader.gif
155 ms
shadow-t.png
155 ms
shadow-rt.png
154 ms
shadow-rb.png
154 ms
shadow-r.png
152 ms
shadow-lt.png
153 ms
shadow-lb.png
323 ms
shadow-l.png
322 ms
shadow-b.png
319 ms
red_grad.gif
317 ms
top_menu_l.gif
316 ms
top_menu_r.gif
318 ms
ga.js
38 ms
home.gif
385 ms
search.gif
389 ms
map.gif
394 ms
logo_smoll.gif
392 ms
search_white.gif
395 ms
logo_smoll.gif
394 ms
ca-pub-2484642966063294.js
106 ms
zrt_lookup.html
106 ms
show_ads_impl.js
55 ms
ear.gif
483 ms
rgr-toe.ma.png
478 ms
rgr-toe.ya.png
482 ms
red_block_tl.gif
506 ms
red_block_tr.gif
509 ms
red_block_br.gif
508 ms
red_block_bl.gif
599 ms
all.js
80 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
top100.scn
147 ms
code.js
317 ms
cnt.js
268 ms
button_c2_14.gif
1293 ms
2500487.js
409 ms
ads
294 ms
osd.js
26 ms
jquery.min.js
42 ms
suggest.js
46 ms
opensearch.js
49 ms
yandex-hint-rb.png
45 ms
b-share-form-button.png
28 ms
advert.gif
190 ms
b-share-form-button_share__icon.png
24 ms
b-share-icon.png
25 ms
b-share-popup_down__tail.png
26 ms
rgr-toe.ru.js
141 ms
1
187 ms
counter
159 ms
m_js_controller.js
20 ms
abg.js
44 ms
favicon
67 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
58 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
23 ms
s
22 ms
x_button_blue2.png
11 ms
cnt
123 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
9 ms
8064871
169 ms
26812653
86 ms
8064871
242 ms
26812653
379 ms
23414332
152 ms
f.gif
123 ms
hotlog_redirects
2716 ms
activeview
14 ms
collect
1100 ms
impression.html
310 ms
sync
266 ms
extra.js
320 ms
tracker
156 ms
impression.html
319 ms
ui
44 ms
cnt
243 ms
pixel
16 ms
385 ms
match
94 ms
rgr-toe.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
rgr-toe.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rgr-toe.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgr-toe.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rgr-toe.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rgr-toe.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rgr Toe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: