6.6 sec in total
210 ms
6 sec
378 ms
Click here to check amazing RhinoCAM content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rhinocam.com
Fully integrated CAM software for Rhino. Rhino + RhinoCAM is a powerful CAD/CAM software combination for design and manufacture. Try our Free Demo Today!
Visit rhinocam.comWe analyzed Rhinocam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rhinocam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.7 s
0/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value20.6 s
0/100
10%
Value35,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.769
5/100
15%
Value48.6 s
0/100
10%
210 ms
2856 ms
198 ms
215 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rhinocam.com, 61% (60 requests) were made to Mecsoft.com and 16% (16 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Mecsoft.com.
Page size can be reduced by 374.1 kB (24%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Rhinocam.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 951.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 224.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RhinoCAM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.2 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhinocam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 37% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (70%)
94
28
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RhinoCAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rhinocam.com
210 ms
2856 ms
style.css
198 ms
grid.css
215 ms
base.css
223 ms
layout.css
285 ms
shortcodes.css
217 ms
slideshow.css
216 ms
prettyPhoto.css
265 ms
tooltipster.css
280 ms
jquery-1.8.0.min.js
89 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
284 ms
bne-testimonials.min.css
282 ms
style.css
436 ms
styles.css
437 ms
cab-style.css
436 ms
social_widget.css
437 ms
testimonials.css
438 ms
default.min.css
442 ms
rpt_style.min.css
443 ms
jquery.js
514 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
447 ms
avia.js
492 ms
frontend.min.js
447 ms
rpt.min.js
446 ms
load.sumome.com
101 ms
js
110 ms
t.js
85 ms
css
66 ms
custom.css
379 ms
frontend.min.css
462 ms
icons.min.css
450 ms
box-shortcodes.css
462 ms
content-shortcodes.css
449 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
461 ms
aviapoly2.js
528 ms
comment-reply.min.js
529 ms
scripts.js
528 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
528 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
540 ms
testimonials.js
539 ms
jquery.easing.js
539 ms
dynamic.to.top.min.js
537 ms
wp-embed.min.js
476 ms
frontend.min.js
459 ms
ctct-plugin-frontend.min.js
543 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
318 ms
collect
19 ms
font-awesome.css
185 ms
sddefault.jpg
107 ms
MecSoft-Logo22.png
234 ms
eu_icon.png
167 ms
RhinoMILLButton.png
234 ms
RhinoTURNButton.png
444 ms
RhinoNESTButton.png
444 ms
RhinoARTButton.png
270 ms
infoicon.png
271 ms
check.gif
444 ms
sddefault.jpg
121 ms
sddefault.jpg
123 ms
sddefault.jpg
124 ms
sddefault.jpg
123 ms
sddefault.jpg
123 ms
sddefault.jpg
124 ms
sddefault.jpg
148 ms
sddefault.jpg
231 ms
sddefault.jpg
149 ms
sddefault.jpg
232 ms
sddefault.jpg
152 ms
sddefault.jpg
150 ms
sddefault.jpg
164 ms
sddefault.jpg
228 ms
sddefault.jpg
183 ms
conversion_async.js
95 ms
84 ms
icon-search-button.png
261 ms
shadow_sidebar_01.png
260 ms
shadow_sidebar_03.png
261 ms
shadow_sidebar_02.png
306 ms
facebook.png
305 ms
twitter.png
305 ms
linkedin.png
304 ms
youtube.png
305 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
175 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
459 ms
57ffc54992cc93de1c000011.js
204 ms
175 ms
widget
497 ms
bg-button.png
154 ms
tagjs
2 ms
25 ms
adsct
79 ms
tap.php
44 ms
pixel
57 ms
cb
12 ms
bounce
45 ms
cb
4 ms
sd
29 ms
rhinocam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rhinocam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rhinocam.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhinocam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhinocam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rhinocam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RhinoCAM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: