5.3 sec in total
1 sec
3.8 sec
381 ms
Visit richardmiles.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Richard Miles content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richardmiles.co.uk
Graphic Design company based in Leeds, UK
Visit richardmiles.co.ukWe analyzed Richardmiles.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
richardmiles.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
1027 ms
132 ms
345 ms
319 ms
348 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Richardmiles.co.uk, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardmiles.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 455.4 kB (25%)
1.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Richardmiles.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richard Miles images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 184.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 243.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardmiles.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (83%)
46
8
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richard Miles. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.richardmiles.co.uk
1027 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
132 ms
styles.css
345 ms
sow-headline-sow-headline-d9c965e65642.css
319 ms
style.css
348 ms
sow-features-features-7171654e01fb.css
320 ms
style.css
343 ms
uaf.css
262 ms
css
68 ms
bootstrap.min.css
481 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
450 ms
font-awesome.min.css
445 ms
owl-carousel.min.css
452 ms
style.css
454 ms
jetpack.css
462 ms
jquery.js
648 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
552 ms
js-map.min.js
551 ms
photon.js
558 ms
jquery.form.min.js
568 ms
scripts.js
579 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
657 ms
core.min.js
654 ms
widget.min.js
656 ms
progressbar.min.js
663 ms
bootstrap.min.js
696 ms
owl-carousel.min.js
757 ms
count-to.min.js
751 ms
visible.min.js
764 ms
plugins.min.js
772 ms
scripts.min.js
773 ms
wp-embed.min.js
800 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
css
24 ms
css
36 ms
main.css
412 ms
front-page-header.png
1013 ms
richard_miles_design_logo2.png
184 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
153 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
159 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
170 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
168 ms
160306033618Lunchbox.woff
312 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
394 ms
js
96 ms
hovercard.css
42 ms
services.css
65 ms
ajax-loader.gif
121 ms
g.gif
10 ms
richardmiles.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
richardmiles.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
richardmiles.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardmiles.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardmiles.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardmiles.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richard Miles. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: