5.1 sec in total
816 ms
4.2 sec
173 ms
Visit richardroop.com now to see the best up-to-date Richard Roop content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richardroop.com
(Are you a real estate investor? Want to learn how to find more deals, raise more money, and generate bigger profits for free with instant online access? Click here for FREE real estate investor train...
Visit richardroop.comWe analyzed Richardroop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 816 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
richardroop.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value4,810 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
816 ms
573 ms
566 ms
68 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Richardroop.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Audioacrobat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardroop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 368.5 kB (41%)
889.6 kB
521.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardroop.com main page is 889.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 414.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richard Roop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 262.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardroop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (63%)
56
21
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richard Roop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richardroop.com
816 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
573 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.min.js
566 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
68 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
140 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
175 ms
SpryMenuBar.js
240 ms
SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css
228 ms
SpryMenuBarVertical.css
711 ms
highslide_full_packed_4-1.js
439 ms
style.css
254 ms
menu6724.css
262 ms
menu6725.css
292 ms
highslide_custom.js
294 ms
highslide_styles.css
327 ms
common.css
333 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
34 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
322 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
613 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.css
32 ms
jquery.ui.selectable.css
34 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
35 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.css
59 ms
jquery.ui.button.css
63 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.css
64 ms
jquery.ui.slider.css
88 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
91 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.css
95 ms
jquery.ui.progressbar.css
96 ms
button.css
93 ms
playweb
159 ms
recollage2w.jpg
475 ms
seal_200.jpg
127 ms
roop_wood.jpg
131 ms
270_589475.jpg
201 ms
free-pass-140x198.jpg
259 ms
sms-logo-141c.JPG
301 ms
seal_141.jpg
501 ms
Cash%20Now_141a.gif
188 ms
270_629092.jpg
501 ms
REMMR_141.jpg
254 ms
5x5_141.jpg
1489 ms
upg_141.jpg
295 ms
270_599309.jpg
422 ms
270_599306.jpg
371 ms
270_599307.jpg
531 ms
downloadmp3.gif
112 ms
gradientBG_Light2Dark_75.png
380 ms
bgslice.jpg
411 ms
RR_banner.jpg
574 ms
gradient_silver.jpg
441 ms
SpryMenuBarRight.gif
456 ms
menu6724.css
484 ms
web_js.js
65 ms
style_print_common.css
31 ms
rounded-white.png
617 ms
zoomout.cur
36 ms
loader.white.gif
31 ms
richardroop.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
richardroop.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
richardroop.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardroop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Richardroop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardroop.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richard Roop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: