4.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.2 sec
133 ms
Welcome to riegl.com homepage info - get ready to check RIEGL best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about riegl.com
Visit riegl.comWe analyzed Riegl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
riegl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
1081 ms
482 ms
256 ms
638 ms
641 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Riegl.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Riegl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.6 kB (9%)
2.8 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Riegl.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RIEGL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riegl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (41%)
56
33
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RIEGL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riegl.com
1081 ms
stylesheet_2bb51ed8eb.css
482 ms
moodalbox.css
256 ms
rieglscreen.css
638 ms
mootools.js
641 ms
moodalbox.js
383 ms
riegl.js
383 ms
javascript_0b12553063.js
459 ms
Cyberhouse.Flashbanner.js
511 ms
banner.css
511 ms
jsbn.js
578 ms
prng4.js
491 ms
rng.js
555 ms
rsa.js
555 ms
base64.js
611 ms
rsaauth_min.js
652 ms
youtube5.png
715 ms
facebook_16x16px.jpg
637 ms
twitter_16x16px.jpg
652 ms
linkedin_16x16px.jpg
655 ms
wordpress_16x16px.jpg
761 ms
metaButtonLogin.gif
135 ms
metaButtonGo.gif
136 ms
printer.jpg
135 ms
Banner-vmx-1ha_-970x248_2016-02-23.jpg
490 ms
Banner-vmq-1ha_-970x248_2016-02-16.jpg
665 ms
Banner-VZ-400i_-970x248_2016-02-22.jpg
613 ms
Banner-vp1_-970x248_2016-02-22.jpg
892 ms
Banner-VQ-880-G-970x248_01.jpg
638 ms
Banner-VZ-2000_-970x248_14-09-2015.jpg
1024 ms
Banner-LMS-Q1560-970x248_v4.png
1300 ms
Banner-VZ-4000-970x248.png
1380 ms
Banner-VMX-450-970x248.png
1403 ms
flash_header_ils_02.jpg
906 ms
flash_header_distancemeters.jpg
1655 ms
logo.png
1027 ms
TLS-start_01-09-2014_sw_01.jpg
1151 ms
TLS-start_01-09-2014.jpg
1149 ms
ALS_sw.jpg
1270 ms
ALS_4c.jpg
1280 ms
Starseite-uav-bild-vux-1-sw.jpg
1391 ms
Starseite-uav-bild-vux-1-farbe.jpg
1407 ms
mobile_sw_2011.jpg
1414 ms
mobile_4c_2011.jpg
1507 ms
ILS_sw_2011.jpg
1511 ms
ILS_4c_2011.jpg
1529 ms
Distancemeter_sw.jpg
1535 ms
Distancemeter_4c.jpg
1530 ms
metaSeparator.gif
1531 ms
navigationTopBg.jpg
1516 ms
navigationSeparator.gif
1540 ms
teaserArrow.gif
1528 ms
contentArrow03.gif
1545 ms
contentArrow01.gif
1634 ms
footerBg.gif
1643 ms
ga.js
9 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
collect
62 ms
riegl.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
riegl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
riegl.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riegl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riegl.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
riegl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RIEGL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: