4.6 sec in total
339 ms
3.2 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Riff Point content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riffpoint.com
When in search of a smart IT Outstaffing, web and mobile apps development, check what Riff Point team has to offer: high quality, expert staff, for all budgets worldwide.
Visit riffpoint.comWe analyzed Riffpoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
riffpoint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.413
24/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
339 ms
991 ms
144 ms
237 ms
281 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Riffpoint.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Platform-api.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (991 ms) belongs to the original domain Riffpoint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (86%)
1.8 MB
260.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Riffpoint.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riff Point needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 90% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 202.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 225.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riffpoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 225.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (64%)
44
16
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riff Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riffpoint.com
339 ms
riffpoint.com
991 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
144 ms
style.min.css
237 ms
style.css
281 ms
style.css
380 ms
style.css
279 ms
style.css
282 ms
bootstrap.min.css
280 ms
font-awesome.min.css
327 ms
devicons.min.css
368 ms
tw-pagination.css
370 ms
jquery.js
565 ms
main.js
377 ms
testimonials.js
417 ms
portfolio.js
459 ms
gallery.js
458 ms
main.js
476 ms
main.js
475 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
521 ms
jquery.sticky.js
552 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
552 ms
jquery.mobile-1.4.0.min.js
872 ms
sharethis.js
19 ms
style.css
772 ms
style.css
613 ms
wp-embed.min.js
603 ms
main.js
603 ms
recaptcha.js
610 ms
api.js
33 ms
analytics.js
297 ms
logo.png
256 ms
overlay.png
256 ms
banner-img.jpg
558 ms
banner-bg.png
256 ms
dark-bg.png
255 ms
dotted.png
252 ms
process-line-top.png
374 ms
process-line-bottom.png
381 ms
case-study-slider-background.png
694 ms
dark-bg.png
380 ms
map.png
609 ms
required-icon-small.png
416 ms
form-element-bg.png
417 ms
roboto-regular.woff
483 ms
robotocondensed-light.woff
606 ms
robotocondensed-bold.woff
683 ms
roboto-medium.woff
564 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
604 ms
roboto-light.woff
672 ms
robotocondensed-regular.woff
671 ms
recaptcha__en.js
102 ms
collect
201 ms
riffpoint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
riffpoint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
riffpoint.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riffpoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riffpoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riffpoint.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riff Point. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: