6.6 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.5 sec
1.2 sec
Visit rileyjford.com now to see the best up-to-date Riley J Ford content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rileyjford.com
Visit rileyjford.comWe analyzed Rileyjford.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rileyjford.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
1923 ms
190 ms
184 ms
190 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Rileyjford.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rileyjford.com.
Page size can be reduced by 293.0 kB (49%)
600.5 kB
307.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rileyjford.com main page is 600.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 314.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riley J Ford needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.1 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rileyjford.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (66%)
77
26
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riley J Ford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rileyjford.com
1923 ms
system.base.css
190 ms
system.menus.css
184 ms
system.messages.css
190 ms
system.theme.css
190 ms
comment.css
187 ms
field.css
277 ms
flexslider_img.css
276 ms
mollom.css
274 ms
node.css
274 ms
search.css
277 ms
followblock.css
380 ms
user.css
382 ms
views.css
380 ms
ctools.css
373 ms
panels.css
380 ms
superfish.css
459 ms
superfish-vertical.css
459 ms
superfish-navbar.css
460 ms
default.css
461 ms
at.settings.style.headings.css
460 ms
at.settings.style.image.css
543 ms
at.settings.style.floatblocks.css
544 ms
at.settings.style.login.css
544 ms
at.layout.css
546 ms
styles.base.css
614 ms
styles.modules.css
618 ms
styles.settings.css
615 ms
colors.css
618 ms
at_commerce.responsive.layout.css
619 ms
at_commerce.fonts.css
690 ms
responsive.custom.css
690 ms
responsive.desktop.css
691 ms
at_commerce.custom.css
690 ms
css
166 ms
jquery.js
932 ms
jquery.once.js
784 ms
drupal.js
1118 ms
jquery.followblock.js
618 ms
panels.js
617 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
671 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
694 ms
superfish.js
608 ms
supersubs.js
606 ms
supposition.js
662 ms
sftouchscreen.js
690 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
687 ms
googleanalytics.js
591 ms
draw.js
639 ms
ga.js
172 ms
RJF-Header-FINAL_0.png
673 ms
blur-seperator.png
315 ms
CDE-1---3D-book-mockup-150px.png
194 ms
FordsCover-Part3-EF_EDIT.jpg
98 ms
RJF_review4book_180px.png
100 ms
DG%20Amazon.jpg
119 ms
SimoneXmas-med.jpg
241 ms
Romance%20Earthquake%20Love-med_0.jpg
685 ms
SimoneBox-FINAL-sm_0.jpg
192 ms
Fifty%20Shades2_med_0.jpg
244 ms
JU-sm160px.jpg
256 ms
JY-sm160px.jpg
321 ms
Into%20You%20-%20ebook.jpg
324 ms
Circus1_sm.jpg
343 ms
Fifty%20Shades2_med.jpg
414 ms
cde2_cover.jpg
416 ms
S1%20link%20160px.jpg
416 ms
S2%20link%20160px.jpg
432 ms
S3%20link%20160px.jpg
486 ms
S4%20link%20160px.jpg
490 ms
S5%20link%20160px.jpg
495 ms
Romance%20Earthquake%20Love-med.jpg
505 ms
nHGgCgQusZY7lVKA-oDNzOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
236 ms
UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
779 ms
NbE6ykYuM2IyEwxQxOIi2P83cGrqhiQgWmjXfohD0fc.ttf
436 ms
46aYWdgz-1oFX11flmyEfZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
487 ms
__utm.gif
75 ms
lookup.json
358 ms
shadow.png
368 ms
responsive.smartphone.portrait.css
84 ms
responsive.smartphone.landscape.css
58 ms
responsive.tablet.portrait.css
59 ms
responsive.tablet.landscape.css
69 ms
rileyjford.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rileyjford.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rileyjford.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rileyjford.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rileyjford.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rileyjford.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riley J Ford. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: