6.6 sec in total
241 ms
5.8 sec
560 ms
Click here to check amazing Riomed content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riomed.com
RioMed is a healthcare IT company based in UK with more than 25 years of experience, our solutions are catering organisations of all sizes
Visit riomed.comWe analyzed Riomed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
riomed.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.4 s
0/100
10%
Value40.0 s
0/100
25%
Value25.4 s
0/100
10%
Value2,490 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value33.5 s
0/100
10%
241 ms
1481 ms
178 ms
2238 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 160 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (135 requests) were addressed to the original Riomed.com, 8% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Riomed.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.8 MB (75%)
6.3 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Riomed.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 186.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riomed needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 MB or 96% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 384.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 384.4 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riomed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.8 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 118 (82%)
144
26
The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riomed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 84 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riomed.com
241 ms
www.riomed.com
1481 ms
cv.css
178 ms
styles.css
2238 ms
font-awesome.min.css
192 ms
my-social.css
197 ms
rs6.css
250 ms
style.css
190 ms
font-awesome.min.css
245 ms
bootstrap-front.css
258 ms
animate.css
269 ms
general.min.css
263 ms
style.min.css
310 ms
email-before-download-public.css
316 ms
style.css
321 ms
base.css
391 ms
layout.css
404 ms
shortcodes.css
396 ms
animations.min.css
386 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
389 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
458 ms
responsive.css
510 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
458 ms
front.min.css
460 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
461 ms
frontend.min.css
593 ms
swiper.min.css
519 ms
post-5164.css
523 ms
all.min.css
537 ms
v4-shims.min.css
572 ms
global.css
582 ms
post-73.css
590 ms
css
17 ms
smartslider.min.css
557 ms
css
18 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
591 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
594 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
609 ms
react.min.js
606 ms
snippet.js
33 ms
js
39 ms
css
13 ms
animations.min.css
567 ms
react-dom.min.js
596 ms
dom-ready.min.js
525 ms
hooks.min.js
536 ms
i18n.min.js
541 ms
a11y.min.js
499 ms
url.min.js
535 ms
api-fetch.min.js
534 ms
blob.min.js
538 ms
autop.min.js
543 ms
block-serialization-default-parser.min.js
533 ms
deprecated.min.js
535 ms
dom.min.js
537 ms
escape-html.min.js
477 ms
element.min.js
486 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
514 ms
keycodes.min.js
510 ms
priority-queue.min.js
512 ms
compose.min.js
471 ms
private-apis.min.js
481 ms
redux-routine.min.js
507 ms
data.min.js
515 ms
html-entities.min.js
477 ms
shortcode.min.js
472 ms
blocks.min.js
547 ms
moment.min.js
500 ms
date.min.js
571 ms
primitives.min.js
474 ms
rich-text.min.js
471 ms
warning.min.js
502 ms
components.min.js
700 ms
keyboard-shortcuts.min.js
491 ms
commands.min.js
491 ms
notices.min.js
513 ms
preferences-persistence.min.js
536 ms
preferences.min.js
530 ms
style-engine.min.js
495 ms
token-list.min.js
510 ms
wordcount.min.js
532 ms
block-editor.min.js
647 ms
server-side-render.min.js
500 ms
index.js
519 ms
jquery.min.js
551 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
540 ms
email-download-link.js
557 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
545 ms
rs6.min.js
619 ms
front.min.js
558 ms
v4-shims.min.js
570 ms
n2.min.js
579 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
559 ms
ss-simple.min.js
569 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
575 ms
w-bullet.min.js
589 ms
index.js
2299 ms
index.js
2251 ms
cv.js
568 ms
tabs-custom.js
585 ms
script.min.js
595 ms
email-before-download-public.js
570 ms
core.min.js
581 ms
mouse.min.js
589 ms
sortable.min.js
605 ms
tabs.min.js
608 ms
accordion.min.js
585 ms
plugins.js
665 ms
menu.js
637 ms
animations.min.js
623 ms
jplayer.min.js
668 ms
translate3d.js
658 ms
scripts.js
674 ms
script.min.js
692 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
673 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
694 ms
waypoints.min.js
707 ms
frontend.min.js
700 ms
RioMed-25th-Years-Anniversary-Logo-1.png
115 ms
1-RioMed%20Web%20Banner.png
594 ms
1-RioMed%20Tab.png
203 ms
Cellma-Web-Banner.png
439 ms
transparent.png
204 ms
Desktop-2.png
232 ms
Tab-2.png
365 ms
cellma-flex-approved-logo-transparent-300x74.png
268 ms
cellma-logo-2_7d9b2abc8d2361bb56332ffc552fde0f.png
337 ms
pt_portal.png
394 ms
dashboard.png
404 ms
app.png
468 ms
patients.png
467 ms
hp_1.png
469 ms
techincal.png
531 ms
procurment.png
528 ms
931-300x200.jpg
530 ms
discussing-spine-x-ray-300x200.jpg
593 ms
Layer-5-12.1-300x200.png
594 ms
js
66 ms
analytics.js
140 ms
www.riomed.com
968 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
114 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
143 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
170 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
191 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
170 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
170 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
188 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
192 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
191 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
191 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
191 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
192 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
457 ms
collect
85 ms
collect
43 ms
ga-audiences
28 ms
jjms7tuinfobitcbga2xn9ohpdm6cbqf.js
180 ms
box_shadow.png
95 ms
render.ee85351c3ff9bce37bb2.js
92 ms
riomed.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
riomed.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
riomed.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riomed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riomed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riomed.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riomed. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: