4.7 sec in total
343 ms
2.7 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to ripost.hu homepage info - get ready to check Ripost best content for Hungary right away, or after learning these important things about ripost.hu
Friss hírek, információk első kézből itthonról és a világból. Hazai és külföldi sztárok titkai, bulvár, sport, életmód, lélekdolgok.
Visit ripost.huWe analyzed Ripost.hu page load time and found that the first response time was 343 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ripost.hu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value19.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value9,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value25.2 s
0/100
10%
343 ms
557 ms
589 ms
360 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Ripost.hu, 25% (15 requests) were made to Ripost.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Viszontvalasz.disqus.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Ripost.hu.
Page size can be reduced by 459.9 kB (55%)
839.8 kB
379.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ripost.hu main page is 839.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 275.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ripost needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 170.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ripost.hu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (27%)
52
38
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ripost.hu
343 ms
allin_h.css
557 ms
ripost1.js
589 ms
ripost2.js
360 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
ripost_mini.png
179 ms
cimlap3.jpg
134 ms
cimlap3.jpg
133 ms
cimlap3.jpg
152 ms
cimlap3.jpg
271 ms
cimlap3.jpg
272 ms
cimlap3.jpg
272 ms
ripost_logo_n2.png
181 ms
nyilci.png
184 ms
cimlap3.jpg
272 ms
cimlap3.jpg
271 ms
cimlap3.jpg
274 ms
mainlayout_7b2fbce537.png
816 ms
track.cgi
342 ms
collect
46 ms
goa3.js
470 ms
count.js
39 ms
collect
63 ms
opensans-regular.woff
207 ms
opensans-semibold.woff
248 ms
opensans-bold.woff
246 ms
opensans-extrabold.woff
247 ms
icomoon2.woff
247 ms
icomoon.woff
312 ms
icomoonx.woff
312 ms
count-data.js
50 ms
count-data.js
114 ms
count-data.js
56 ms
all.js
210 ms
xgemius.js
428 ms
212 ms
breko.php
141 ms
breko.php
148 ms
cimlap0.jpg
273 ms
detect.js
119 ms
cimlap0.jpg
393 ms
cimlap0.jpg
283 ms
cimlap0.jpg
292 ms
cimlap0.jpg
277 ms
cimlap0.jpg
271 ms
1x2.jpg
101 ms
1x2.jpg
102 ms
2x1_b.jpg
101 ms
1x2.jpg
100 ms
1x2.jpg
100 ms
137 ms
xd_arbiter.php
156 ms
xd_arbiter.php
256 ms
fpdata.js
148 ms
lsget.html
256 ms
like.php
128 ms
like.php
131 ms
rexdot.js
136 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
295 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
235 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
293 ms
ripost.hu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ripost.hu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ripost.hu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
HU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripost.hu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ripost.hu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ripost.hu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ripost. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: