10.5 sec in total
728 ms
9.6 sec
258 ms
Click here to check amazing Riptware content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riptware.com
Riptware Web Technology is specialized for IT Services like Web Design and Development, Software Development,, Domain and Hosting Service etc.
Visit riptware.comWe analyzed Riptware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 728 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
riptware.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.5 s
0/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value200 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
728 ms
299 ms
806 ms
1002 ms
510 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Riptware.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Mathmozo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (76%)
2.4 MB
563.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Riptware.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riptware images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 578.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 578.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riptware.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)
23
11
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riptware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mathmozo.com
728 ms
3t79f.css
299 ms
3t79f.css
806 ms
3t79f.css
1002 ms
3t79f.css
510 ms
3t79f.css
316 ms
style.min.css
17 ms
ecomsuite.jpg
543 ms
header-mathmozo-logo.png
400 ms
biz-radix.png
570 ms
smart-campus.png
589 ms
ispeasy.png
665 ms
bill-trackr.png
615 ms
mozo-clinic-system.png
579 ms
img3-1.jpg
1236 ms
jquery-3.6.4.min.js
29 ms
vendor.min.js
1096 ms
theme.min.js
420 ms
custom.js
600 ms
image-cdn.js
652 ms
e-202401.js
23 ms
logo-PNG.png
740 ms
css2
28 ms
css2
40 ms
font
51 ms
font
79 ms
pro-fa-light-300-b4a9ce.ttf
297 ms
pro-fa-light-300-d85a6c.ttf
494 ms
pro-fa-light-300-03c840.ttf
506 ms
pro-fa-light-300-50c900.ttf
504 ms
pro-fa-light-300-3523ab.ttf
505 ms
pro-fa-light-300-6d2a10.ttf
626 ms
pro-fa-light-300-ca12ba.ttf
798 ms
pro-fa-light-300-bc0b04.ttf
986 ms
pro-fa-light-300-292b12.ttf
994 ms
pro-fa-light-300-e9d1d9.ttf
994 ms
pro-fa-light-300-1e5361.ttf
995 ms
pro-fa-light-300-51b08f.ttf
1119 ms
pro-fa-light-300-ec38a0.ttf
1293 ms
pro-fa-light-300-043e6a.ttf
1477 ms
pro-fa-light-300-9b80fe.ttf
1287 ms
pro-fa-light-300-90d968.ttf
1287 ms
pro-fa-light-300-e41116.ttf
1490 ms
pro-fa-light-300-d5bbe9.ttf
1611 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-b4a9ce.ttf
1784 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-d85a6c.ttf
1811 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-03c840.ttf
1790 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-50c900.ttf
1987 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-3523ab.ttf
1982 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-6d2a10.ttf
2104 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-ca12ba.ttf
2281 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-bc0b04.ttf
2277 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-292b12.ttf
2320 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-e9d1d9.ttf
2504 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-1e5361.ttf
2500 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-51b08f.ttf
2606 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-ec38a0.ttf
2813 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-043e6a.ttf
2770 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-9b80fe.ttf
2616 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-90d968.ttf
2797 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-e41116.ttf
2992 ms
pro-fa-thin-100-d5bbe9.ttf
2963 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-b4a9ce.ttf
2815 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-d85a6c.ttf
2772 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-03c840.ttf
2795 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-50c900.ttf
2810 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-3523ab.ttf
2983 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-6d2a10.ttf
2968 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-ca12ba.ttf
2810 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-bc0b04.ttf
2777 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-292b12.ttf
2799 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-e9d1d9.ttf
2812 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-1e5361.ttf
2986 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-51b08f.ttf
2970 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-ec38a0.ttf
2817 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-043e6a.ttf
2974 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-9b80fe.ttf
2796 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-90d968.ttf
2623 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-e41116.ttf
2982 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-d5bbe9.ttf
2984 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-b4a9ce.ttf
2794 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-d85a6c.ttf
2791 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-03c840.ttf
2806 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-50c900.ttf
2770 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-3523ab.ttf
2972 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-6d2a10.ttf
2965 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-ca12ba.ttf
2804 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-bc0b04.ttf
2798 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-292b12.ttf
2790 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-e9d1d9.ttf
2745 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-1e5361.ttf
2949 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-51b08f.ttf
2958 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-ec38a0.ttf
2950 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-043e6a.ttf
2811 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-9b80fe.ttf
2606 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-90d968.ttf
2729 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-e41116.ttf
2908 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-d5bbe9.ttf
2852 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-b4a9ce.ttf
2892 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-d85a6c.ttf
2801 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-03c840.ttf
2767 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-50c900.ttf
2784 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-3523ab.ttf
2808 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-6d2a10.ttf
2852 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-ca12ba.ttf
2885 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-bc0b04.ttf
2795 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-292b12.ttf
2671 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-e9d1d9.ttf
2686 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-1e5361.ttf
2708 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-51b08f.ttf
2853 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-ec38a0.ttf
2854 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-043e6a.ttf
2882 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-9b80fe.ttf
2690 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-90d968.ttf
2590 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-e41116.ttf
2612 ms
pro-fa-sharp-solid-900-d5bbe9.ttf
2606 ms
pro-fa-brands-400-50c900.ttf
2579 ms
pro-fa-brands-400-bc0b04.ttf
2636 ms
pro-fa-brands-400-292b12.ttf
2628 ms
pro-fa-brands-400-9b80fe.ttf
2721 ms
pro-fa-brands-400-90d968.ttf
2614 ms
pro-fa-brands-400-f6b769.ttf
2492 ms
riptware.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
riptware.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
riptware.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riptware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riptware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riptware.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riptware. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: