6.3 sec in total
1.7 sec
4 sec
569 ms
Click here to check amazing Riskhedgehog content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riskhedgehog.com
毎日を安心して安全に過ごしたい。そんな想いに役立つ情報をお届けします。
Visit riskhedgehog.comWe analyzed Riskhedgehog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
riskhedgehog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
1735 ms
506 ms
747 ms
8 ms
1123 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Riskhedgehog.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Riskhedgehog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 381.1 kB (48%)
787.1 kB
406.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Riskhedgehog.com main page is 787.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 349.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riskhedgehog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 205.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.3 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riskhedgehog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (55%)
97
44
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riskhedgehog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riskhedgehog.com
1735 ms
normalize.css
506 ms
style.css
747 ms
font-awesome.css
8 ms
jetpack.css
1123 ms
jquery.min.js
25 ms
widgets.js
12 ms
plusone.js
87 ms
bookmark_button.js
713 ms
adsbygoogle.js
21 ms
q
179 ms
photon.js
188 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
49 ms
gprofiles.js
79 ms
wpgroho.js
171 ms
wp-embed.min.js
211 ms
base.js
339 ms
scroll.js
357 ms
e-201611.js
23 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
856 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
takachihokyo.jpg
71 ms
e-Tax.gif
71 ms
Insecam.jpg
70 ms
feedly-follow-rectangle-volume-small_2x.png
96 ms
chie88_31.gif
668 ms
pv01381481.gif
1022 ms
apple-23484_640.png
62 ms
jumbo-marshmallows.jpg
61 ms
kokudou3.png
64 ms
no-drugs.png
63 ms
cannabis.png
63 ms
cropped-RISKHEDGEHOG20151.jpg
692 ms
search.png
260 ms
biohazard_1.png
62 ms
red-phone.png
90 ms
brown-sugar.jpg
89 ms
nomi-city.jpg
92 ms
bully.png
89 ms
2011_3_11.png
92 ms
stop.png
92 ms
button-only@2x.png
407 ms
margarine.jpg
87 ms
cabbage-e1458017854761.jpg
91 ms
question.jpg
92 ms
no-parking.png
94 ms
HEAD.jpeg
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
32 ms
collect
45 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
btn.js
110 ms
ca-pub-1209088994658189.js
171 ms
zrt_lookup.html
168 ms
show_ads_impl.js
78 ms
8006.js
718 ms
like.php
237 ms
575 ms
ga-audiences
138 ms
ads
189 ms
osd.js
15 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
360 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
394 ms
m_js_controller.js
29 ms
abg.js
46 ms
favicon
115 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
105 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
80 ms
s
58 ms
x_button_blue2.png
52 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
5 ms
reset.css
16 ms
entry-button.css
16 ms
bbtn-l_v3.png
8 ms
popup.js
279 ms
nifty.js
149 ms
colors.js
171 ms
cm
258 ms
hovercard.css
53 ms
services.css
101 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
67 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
23 ms
fastbutton
124 ms
280x30-b-amzn.gif
65 ms
203 ms
312QeCm8-gL._SL60_.jpg
65 ms
510ML+rT3ZL._SL60_.jpg
69 ms
51XXEIxLA2L._SL60_.jpg
64 ms
51A7ZKPW20L._SL60_.jpg
62 ms
button
62 ms
g.gif
39 ms
postmessageRelay
133 ms
button.css
147 ms
shared.js
156 ms
button.js
155 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.ja.html
81 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
82 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
87 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
96 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
63 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
55 ms
pocket_button.png
8 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
riskhedgehog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
riskhedgehog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
riskhedgehog.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riskhedgehog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riskhedgehog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riskhedgehog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riskhedgehog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: