3.6 sec in total
336 ms
3.1 sec
156 ms
Click here to check amazing Rite Tag content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritetag.com
Visit ritetag.comWe analyzed Ritetag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ritetag.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
336 ms
573 ms
353 ms
73 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Ritetag.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.userecho.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritetag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (62%)
2.1 MB
777.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ritetag.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rite Tag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 984.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 984.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritetag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 224.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (28%)
43
31
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rite Tag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritetag.com
336 ms
ritetag.com
573 ms
201602291557-libs.min.css
353 ms
css
73 ms
25195ef7.js
66 ms
201602261855-global.min.css
428 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
36 ms
css
84 ms
TweenLite.min.js
41 ms
CSSPlugin.min.js
47 ms
201602291557-libs.min.js
1096 ms
201602261855-global.min.js
707 ms
25195ef7.css
2 ms
dc.js
96 ms
fbevents.js
64 ms
logo.png
140 ms
chrome.png
132 ms
arrow-signup.png
236 ms
logo-time.png
247 ms
logo-inc.png
337 ms
logo-businessInsider.png
345 ms
logo-theNextWeb.png
340 ms
logo-forbes.png
470 ms
logo-hootsuite.png
903 ms
logo-sej.png
445 ms
logo-socialMediaExaminer.png
445 ms
logo-venturebeat.png
455 ms
logo-huffpost.png
557 ms
logo-entrepreneur.png
551 ms
logo-buffer.png
564 ms
spotify.png
1259 ms
tedxflourcity.png
769 ms
semrush.png
878 ms
nestle.png
891 ms
purina.png
769 ms
kitkat.jpg
863 ms
childfund.jpg
843 ms
vantagepr-logo.jpg
950 ms
feature-audit.png
969 ms
feature-stats.png
987 ms
feature-scans.png
999 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
84 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
87 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1636 ms
ngiFXK5ukde3w4E-Lmb_OvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
94 ms
N9KSa305HxlY5zk6XisHxw.ttf
94 ms
cNycqCSU8dNAVKEAWPvbqw.ttf
77 ms
93 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
widget-1.4.gz.js
592 ms
read
298 ms
Y2hhdA%3D%3D
97 ms
ZmVlZGJhY2s%3D
183 ms
ritetag.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
ritetag.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ritetag.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritetag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ritetag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritetag.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rite Tag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: