6.1 sec in total
2.3 sec
3.5 sec
312 ms
Welcome to rittenhousepayments.com homepage info - get ready to check Rittenhouse Payments best content right away, or after learning these important things about rittenhousepayments.com
We utilize the most advanced technology and resources in the prepaid debit card and card program management space, helping our clients efficiently and affordably create and execute on the endless value-d...
Visit rittenhousepayments.comWe analyzed Rittenhousepayments.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rittenhousepayments.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
2270 ms
221 ms
156 ms
63 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Rittenhousepayments.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rittenhousepayments.com.
Page size can be reduced by 49.3 kB (12%)
421.8 kB
372.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rittenhousepayments.com main page is 421.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 339.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rittenhouse Payments images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (75%)
59
15
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rittenhouse Payments. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rittenhousepayments.com
2270 ms
jquery.js
221 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
156 ms
js
63 ms
scripts-e270a27bde1a984ba06f13536a47ecc0.js
139 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script-07d3d83430bed4101c88218bd9e9ce9b.js
257 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
257 ms
masonry.min.js
259 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
263 ms
map-style-a807b7e87e4b20e8aa99004fc1ea115e.js
266 ms
jquery.countdown-854d890f3a9ef35c34d39c184de5b837.js
292 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
293 ms
jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js
292 ms
jquery.matchHeight-76459b61a89ff758677d941c9163b719.js
292 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3-14405636fce832d69028a464dc23aca2.js
292 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
321 ms
jquery.swipebox-0af3948f0d3eb2d53150a5df264b7361.js
389 ms
jquery.zoomslider-4ebdf82c56ddc525810183c507d6b127.js
389 ms
scrollreveal-9bd4b6498f7fba6896e7d36abab3962d.js
389 ms
swiper.jquery-c4706e0cb371e50428e7f687a26ebae0.js
453 ms
jquery.nicescroll-b7747f52baadedf77b3bc15cb1355068.js
456 ms
waypoint-1df3a3bda1726e55af7fbfc4022e502c.js
391 ms
nouislider.min.js
464 ms
particles-46847c829e10470a6c1e37e6f9025afc.js
468 ms
scripts-d18a50a60372b492982a0b1e935eaa3b.js
463 ms
pace-9aa43ef7644d8174c14c3d2550f4ea7d.js
465 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
534 ms
lazyload.min.js
592 ms
banner.jpg
580 ms
form-bg.jpg
582 ms
css
90 ms
style.min.css
395 ms
styles-a9f7d7de17aba39a352cab68c38f0bbd.css
392 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
425 ms
bootstrap-grid-4aaddcd036d32f96492314c3ae51f114.css
490 ms
plugins-09fe56bcdceef5da89fcee0babe3ad68.css
445 ms
style-d4c5bf4c087c024b8341b76a1ffd6706.css
448 ms
js_composer.min-02bd7c2a9aeace637fbc8df0cedb9fe7.css
570 ms
dashicons.min-7dfc597ac09517a2f4e6c576c1b6ce8b.css
607 ms
linecons-053df778cdb60070f6f198db67b11531.css
611 ms
font-awesome.min-7a57dd119fe1a3e10086e912d67bbd76.css
601 ms
entypo-cb470b194ac95da8120c2b4b7d1bfbf5.css
667 ms
lnr-689199e7a2758a5e6eb79d11d23c9921.css
613 ms
typcn-c016a0edf82fcf0348e7c8442329d60b.css
620 ms
unycon-6e3f43ffa75681b691dc95327283082a.css
625 ms
Defaults-90ab3bc607a53a23415d8c0022f428a3.css
630 ms
js
64 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
style-9fdf91eb06916303fe92ec32ea03153b.css
691 ms
font
40 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff
56 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff
67 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff
67 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff
66 ms
collect
50 ms
refill
601 ms
RH-logo.png
352 ms
quick-decions-e1551112543372.png
352 ms
octopay-e1551112060579.png
353 ms
computer-e1551112573424.png
376 ms
secure-process-e1551112030694.png
411 ms
abstract-blue.jpg
411 ms
RH-logo-300x121.png
411 ms
ajax-loader.gif
411 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
159 ms
rittenhousepayments.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rittenhousepayments.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rittenhousepayments.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rittenhousepayments.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rittenhousepayments.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rittenhousepayments.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rittenhouse Payments. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: