4.5 sec in total
230 ms
3.5 sec
804 ms
Welcome to rivergreen.com homepage info - get ready to check Rivergreen best content right away, or after learning these important things about rivergreen.com
Hollybridge is the very best in contemporary design and architecture, the next phase of River Green’s unique waterfront, master-planned by one of the world’s most significant developers.
Visit rivergreen.comWe analyzed Rivergreen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rivergreen.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.4 s
0/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
17/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
230 ms
187 ms
38 ms
280 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Rivergreen.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Two.rivergreen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 785.1 kB (16%)
5.0 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Rivergreen.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rivergreen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 307.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rivergreen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (35%)
60
39
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rivergreen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
two.rivergreen.com
230 ms
queryloader2.min.js
187 ms
css
38 ms
bootstrap.css
280 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
191 ms
main.css
193 ms
litetooltip.css
197 ms
font-awesome.css
197 ms
animate.css
290 ms
bootstrapValidator.css
293 ms
queryLoader.css
294 ms
panorama360.css
293 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
367 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
main.js
467 ms
alll.js
1006 ms
analytics.js
66 ms
loading_animation.gif
96 ms
mobile_close.png
95 ms
sticky_header_bg.gif
106 ms
logo-sticky-header.png
106 ms
logo-mobile.png
276 ms
btn-open.png
184 ms
btn-close.png
197 ms
hp-banner-image2.jpg
931 ms
keyline.png
261 ms
2rg-landing-banner.jpg
1369 ms
indicator-on.png
289 ms
indicator-off.png
352 ms
landing-sl1-.jpg
1272 ms
landing-sl2-.jpg
838 ms
landing-sl3-.jpg
1174 ms
landing-sl4-.jpg
1263 ms
landing-sl5-.jpg
2243 ms
landing-sl6.jpg
1588 ms
kitchen-hover.png
2287 ms
suites-kitchen.jpg
1355 ms
bathroom-hover.png
1372 ms
suites-bathroom.jpg
1447 ms
livingroom-hover.png
1458 ms
suites-livingroom.jpg
1462 ms
bedroom-hover.png
1538 ms
suites-bedroom.jpg
1549 ms
2RG-brown-bg.gif
1553 ms
suite-qfacts-bg.jpg
1718 ms
triangle-brown.png
1640 ms
proximity-info.png
1646 ms
triangle-brown-sm.png
1786 ms
proximity-info-1-resp.png
1731 ms
proximity-info-2-resp.png
1809 ms
proximity-info-3-resp.png
1784 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
14 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
14 ms
collect
19 ms
DidotHTFL11LigIta.woff
1795 ms
Gotham-Bold.woff
1922 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2085 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
2003 ms
footer-brands-2.png
2052 ms
footer-brands-1.png
2107 ms
analytics.js
374 ms
collect
6 ms
_ldst.gif
183 ms
proximity-info.png
96 ms
proximity-info-1-resp.png
93 ms
proximity-info-2-resp.png
93 ms
proximity-info-3-resp.png
94 ms
kitchen-hover.png
274 ms
bathroom-hover.png
275 ms
livingroom-hover.png
185 ms
bedroom-hover.png
274 ms
rivergreen.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rivergreen.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rivergreen.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rivergreen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rivergreen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rivergreen.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rivergreen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: