4.7 sec in total
284 ms
3.5 sec
898 ms
Click here to check amazing RM2 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rm2.co.uk
RM2 are the Employee Share Scheme Specialists. The RM2 Partnership designs, implements & administers Employee Share Incentive Plans for private companies
Visit rm2.co.ukWe analyzed Rm2.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rm2.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
284 ms
1029 ms
66 ms
240 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Rm2.co.uk, 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Apikeys.civiccomputing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rm2.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 128.8 kB (9%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rm2.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 872.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 127.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RM2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 558 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 330 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rm2.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (88%)
58
7
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RM2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rm2.co.uk
284 ms
www.rm2.co.uk
1029 ms
gtm.js
66 ms
autoptimize_single_3fd2afa98866679439097f4ab102fe0a.css
240 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
321 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
325 ms
font-awesome.min.css
322 ms
stylesheet.min.css
589 ms
autoptimize_single_4fe1858c1704416657e621748bc941d7.css
325 ms
autoptimize_single_f39c70ecf57c6a46831ecf59021da547.css
326 ms
responsive.min.css
483 ms
autoptimize_single_f5ab39d93a132513d9636a43da98cdfb.css
400 ms
frontend.min.css
489 ms
swiper.min.css
406 ms
post-68.css
410 ms
post-6.css
480 ms
autoptimize_single_353323fdcf4eacfab283fea652bc0414.css
494 ms
jquery.min.js
500 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
560 ms
lazysizes.min.js
477 ms
autoptimize_single_a53a916adf48efefd5a2aa0861ebbc07.js
480 ms
autoptimize_single_83a062cf6545b990c13b4398035a29d0.js
490 ms
core.min.js
501 ms
accordion.min.js
704 ms
menu.min.js
705 ms
autoptimize_single_eae574630691cbf72e5796b9d7572260.js
706 ms
modernizr.min.js
706 ms
autoptimize_single_72f19f5f564a43b1175f9ce86981987c.js
710 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
709 ms
autoptimize_single_d5b41c85347745f9b6a2275abd5ad84b.js
717 ms
autoptimize_single_da79e5d89801c31d6c4fc14c4b4b2331.js
718 ms
autoptimize_single_95ba7bb2e3c9da8d1322daadc7ce2457.js
718 ms
autoptimize_single_c8cc66a2ffc63efc356237634245fbb3.js
718 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
719 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
720 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
735 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
736 ms
autoptimize_single_f556337e0f81cf84d8e083a0a0c07ea4.js
736 ms
js
42 ms
autoptimize_single_4d0379f34605a637fc1fe32344a29096.js
726 ms
autoptimize_single_3637fe9df875e14939193bc389e1a249.js
610 ms
autoptimize_single_38ade284e1c3428a4f273a5d7d253946.js
542 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
566 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
588 ms
swiper.min.js
588 ms
autoptimize_single_848541d049801e8d48d70c1ca54a7b55.js
608 ms
default.min.js
567 ms
comment-reply.min.js
538 ms
qode-like.min.js
558 ms
ccc-cookie-control.js
498 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
521 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
619 ms
waypoints.min.js
616 ms
frontend.min.js
611 ms
Scissors.png
763 ms
emi-2.jpg
557 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
424 ms
v
542 ms
logo-1.png
93 ms
RM2-header2.jpg
273 ms
js
63 ms
rm2.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rm2.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rm2.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rm2.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rm2.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rm2.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RM2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: