2.9 sec in total
50 ms
1.7 sec
1.2 sec
Visit rmapack.com now to see the best up-to-date Rmapack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rmapack.com
老域名,精品域名出售
Visit rmapack.comWe analyzed Rmapack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rmapack.com performance score
50 ms
74 ms
35 ms
49 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Rmapack.com, 29% (14 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmapack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 606.6 kB (31%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rmapack.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rmapack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 303.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 231.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmapack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 231.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)
47
33
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmapack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rmapack.com
50 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
74 ms
autoptimize_cb2cb6a96db4c9db0dda73a678d91b43.css
35 ms
autoptimize_b6fd9ec333120ec9786fbfb172de1531.css
49 ms
jquery.js
49 ms
js
192 ms
right.js
190 ms
autoptimize_2e1527e07aedf0f8e820498fed3b9dcb.js
61 ms
logo_50.png
157 ms
automatic_pouch_packing_machine.jpg
446 ms
bag_packing_machine-banner.jpg
381 ms
open_mouth_bagging_machine.jpg
328 ms
premade_pouch_packing_machine.jpg
329 ms
vertical_form_fill_seal_machine.jpg
355 ms
History.png
226 ms
services.jpg
360 ms
our-team.jpg
451 ms
Package-Types.png
456 ms
Quality-Control.jpg
557 ms
factory.jpg
553 ms
Bag-Packing-Machine.jpg
747 ms
Premade-Pouch-Packing-Machine.jpg
691 ms
Automatic-Pouch-Packing-Machine.jpg
707 ms
Vertical-Form-Fill-Seal-Machine.jpg
709 ms
Open-Mouth-Bagging-Machine.jpg
861 ms
Powder-Packaging-Machine.jpg
829 ms
Granule-Packing-Machine.jpg
906 ms
Secondary-Packaging-Machine.jpg
996 ms
Multihead-Weighing-Machine.jpg
974 ms
horizontal-carton-wrapping-machine-automatic-cartoning-machine-370x270.jpg
948 ms
Intelligent-Box-Taping-Machine-Carton-Sealer-Packaging-Industry-370x270.jpg
1023 ms
High-Efficiency-Secondary-Packaging-Machine-Automatic-Carton-Sealing-Machine-370x270.jpg
1058 ms
Carton-Box-Packaging-Machine-Secondary-Packing-High-Reliability-370x270.jpg
1107 ms
ar.png
24 ms
nl.png
27 ms
en.png
26 ms
fr.png
26 ms
de.png
27 ms
it.png
26 ms
ja.png
34 ms
fa.png
32 ms
pt.png
32 ms
ru.png
33 ms
es.png
33 ms
tr.png
33 ms
th.png
34 ms
css
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1140 ms
jquery.js
22 ms
rmapack.com SEO score
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmapack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rmapack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmapack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rmapack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: