2.3 sec in total
130 ms
1.7 sec
422 ms
Click here to check amazing Rmf Group content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rmf-group.com
Visit rmf-group.comWe analyzed Rmf-group.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rmf-group.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.792
5/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
130 ms
88 ms
262 ms
141 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Rmf-group.com, 42% (30 requests) were made to D163axztg8am2h.cloudfront.net and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) relates to the external source D163axztg8am2h.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 106.4 kB (7%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rmf-group.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rmf Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 81.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmf-group.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (46%)
50
27
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmf Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmf-group.com
130 ms
www.rmf-group.com
88 ms
www.rmf-group.com
262 ms
js
141 ms
95a3f65db88596cb8ebab5ad7d98.gz.css
96 ms
f4c6597069d8745190091c651bad.gz.css
76 ms
19be1d22ac74076d75cbccfc6d97.gz.css
114 ms
css2
115 ms
css2
117 ms
materialdesignicons.min.css
77 ms
modernizr.js
55 ms
nomad-client.js
178 ms
vue.min.js
261 ms
vuetify.min.js
474 ms
vue-resource.min.js
305 ms
vue-composition.js
301 ms
vue-demi.js
286 ms
nomad-currency-input.js
295 ms
nomad-simple-validation.js
315 ms
nomad-control-group.js
337 ms
common.js
348 ms
jquery.min.js
107 ms
c5bc492da19a369b565824adab02.gz.js
111 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
342 ms
owl.carousel.js
344 ms
matchheight.js
355 ms
css
23 ms
49b5d37b3218a2b15fc34b209902.gz.js
4 ms
9dd09cb775d9acdf6935ea333534.gz.js
4 ms
ce99200c6ecbd807f3f96c24dde8.gz.js
4 ms
desks.png
166 ms
seating.png
166 ms
panel-systems.png
166 ms
filing-and-storage.png
166 ms
accessories.png
165 ms
colorful-coolmesh-1.png
214 ms
fuse-modular-seating-1.png
214 ms
manics-ergonomic-seating-1.png
214 ms
premium-metal-pedestals-1.png
214 ms
add582931a34dd549a399a58744b.png
13 ms
035621537f06fb65e9ceb4b93b09.png
140 ms
5bab9a27945b89895e20526b9762.png
320 ms
fdddddf331f7f6e319d2a2bb693a.png
152 ms
6bf768e2c93e9fedb02a55a05807.png
152 ms
df9fdb0e8587d11d69a1c622e672.png
159 ms
87ebe6568bf2c9c2ab3ab3adea66.png
193 ms
analytics.js
99 ms
02ab5dd9a6c180af0c5e4edcf82f.jpg
43 ms
f1de2ec0811249af9d3863d8355e.jpg
480 ms
398290f7289eb49f55d8ddc97af4.jpg
42 ms
bcd577933daf9db0070d36a2118e.jpg
552 ms
fae810cb9671401886c2c6678698.jpg
52 ms
045091cc325893d56bed3c854c49.jpg
538 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
59 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
101 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
114 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
113 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
113 ms
f4f86819de195af1050faf4b0099.png
55 ms
b44be66b6da2fccb6c83b88bddb0.png
54 ms
3636ed989364ecb4fe0264c0fd47.png
80 ms
1c5fe7164606ca25262877cdd7ed.png
81 ms
1274efdd0705b8d192ce13468442.png
98 ms
c0ec22de1fb93866967e9124f849.png
97 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
68 ms
ecf46d457f1aa95bf69b3ae7fdb6.png
55 ms
cb15cd3082b3bddf319dfa78c236.png
59 ms
a8163e06dc59b4b8077f22430343.png
59 ms
b0fcae8bd4f29e0571e3ec6d1bcb.png
59 ms
rmf-group.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
rmf-group.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rmf-group.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmf-group.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmf-group.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmf-group.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rmf Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: