9.7 sec in total
1.7 sec
7.9 sec
150 ms
Click here to check amazing Rncet content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rncet.com
Visit rncet.comWe analyzed Rncet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
rncet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
1672 ms
636 ms
643 ms
961 ms
652 ms
Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Rncet.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rncet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 824.9 kB (31%)
2.7 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Rncet.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rncet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 601.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 601.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rncet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (21%)
107
84
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rncet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rncet.com
1672 ms
styles.css
636 ms
menu.js
643 ms
mm_menu.js
961 ms
template_css.css
652 ms
transmenuh.css
661 ms
transmenu.js
1269 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
966 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
1626 ms
jqFancyTransitions.js
976 ms
followus.js
676 ms
submenu.js
965 ms
ad.js
488 ms
crawler.js
256 ms
bg.jpg
339 ms
apply-corner.gif
337 ms
RNCollege.jpg
1304 ms
menu_01.jpg
324 ms
menu_02.jpg
325 ms
menu_03.jpg
335 ms
menu_04.jpg
668 ms
menu_05.jpg
669 ms
menu_06.jpg
670 ms
menu_07.jpg
671 ms
menu_08.jpg
669 ms
leftMenu_01.jpg
998 ms
leftMenu_02.jpg
996 ms
leftMenu_03.jpg
991 ms
leftMenu_04.jpg
993 ms
leftMenu_05.jpg
1002 ms
leftMenu_06.jpg
1315 ms
leftMenu_07.jpg
1318 ms
leftMenu_08.jpg
1325 ms
leftMenu_09.jpg
1333 ms
x.gif
1325 ms
undefined
1602 ms
newsBg2.jpg
1618 ms
circlestyle.jpg
2262 ms
bannerLeft.jpg
1639 ms
bannerTop.jpg
1644 ms
01.jpg
2974 ms
03.jpg
1926 ms
04.jpg
3193 ms
06.jpg
2611 ms
07.jpg
2629 ms
09.jpg
2883 ms
10.jpg
2594 ms
11.jpg
2913 ms
embed
176 ms
img-08Z8xWZD-6.gif
60 ms
bannerRight.jpg
2907 ms
ourPlacementsHeading.jpg
2927 ms
ga.js
21 ms
js15_as.js
39 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
0.php
5 ms
js
75 ms
init_embed.js
29 ms
applyonline.gif
2911 ms
recuriter.jpg
2942 ms
HCL.jpg
2969 ms
smc.jpg
2992 ms
infosys.jpg
2999 ms
common.js
62 ms
map.js
61 ms
google4.png
72 ms
overlay.js
70 ms
util.js
95 ms
onion.js
66 ms
search_impl.js
89 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
203 ms
stats.js
89 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
57 ms
transparent.png
49 ms
kh
126 ms
controls.js
75 ms
vt
111 ms
vt
121 ms
vt
140 ms
vt
164 ms
vt
130 ms
css
101 ms
mapcnt6.png
42 ms
amrapali.jpg
2870 ms
birla_sun.jpg
2887 ms
bajaj.jpg
2919 ms
elenchus.jpg
2949 ms
proteck.jpg
2980 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
35 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
42 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
40 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
14 ms
veedol_1.jpg
2675 ms
zephyr.jpg
2864 ms
veedol_2.jpg
2882 ms
ideafoundation.jpg
2914 ms
investor.jpg
2946 ms
zephyr1.jpg
2682 ms
quatrro.jpg
2686 ms
emerging.jpg
2858 ms
socialmedia.png
2875 ms
menuRolover_02.jpg
335 ms
menuRolover_03.jpg
333 ms
menuRolover_06.jpg
324 ms
menuRolover_07.jpg
328 ms
menuRolover_08.jpg
325 ms
leftmenuRolover_01.jpg
334 ms
leftmenuRolover_03.jpg
638 ms
leftmenuRolover_04.jpg
642 ms
leftmenuRolover_05.jpg
650 ms
leftmenuRolover_06.jpg
648 ms
leftmenuRolover_07.jpg
655 ms
leftmenuRolover_08.jpg
668 ms
leftmenuRolover_09.jpg
960 ms
rncet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rncet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rncet.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rncet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rncet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rncet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rncet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: