4.2 sec in total
293 ms
1.8 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to rockhoundblog.com homepage info - get ready to check Rockhoundblog best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rockhoundblog.com
Rockhound Blog is the number one resource for everything to do with rockhounding, minerals, science, geology, and rocks! Whether you need informative information about being a rockhound, or just facts...
Visit rockhoundblog.comWe analyzed Rockhoundblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rockhoundblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,040 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
293 ms
127 ms
125 ms
379 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rockhoundblog.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rockhoundblog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 508.1 kB (39%)
1.3 MB
786.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rockhoundblog.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 621.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockhoundblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 202.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.0 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 209.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockhoundblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (32%)
65
44
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockhoundblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rockhoundblog.com
293 ms
style.css
127 ms
styles.css
125 ms
jquery.js
379 ms
counter_xhtml.js
8 ms
show_ads.js
20 ms
scripts.js
123 ms
t.php
248 ms
button1-bm.gif
65 ms
bg.gif
173 ms
feed.png
242 ms
pic.jpg
636 ms
WebPages.jpg
242 ms
Mulga_Rush_Prospecting_with_drill-300x166.jpg
275 ms
Mulga_Rush_opal-300x240.jpg
275 ms
Mulga_rush_dusty-300x137.jpg
359 ms
Mulga_Rush_fossickers-300x118.jpg
358 ms
Glengarry_Hilton_Opal_Bar-300x223.jpg
376 ms
Glengarry_Hilton_opal_Chat-300x291.jpg
625 ms
Glengarry_opal_field-300x209.jpg
604 ms
Glengarry-opal-field-300x142.jpg
610 ms
sheepyard_inn-300x183.jpg
610 ms
showers-300x165.jpg
623 ms
sheepyard_opal_field-300x165.jpg
661 ms
Sheepyard-Opal-Field-300x203.jpg
775 ms
Grawin_opal_field_old_camp-300x200.jpg
775 ms
Grawin_opal_field-300x208.jpg
775 ms
ukafh-300x140.jpg
770 ms
Amateur-Fossil-hunting1-300x136.jpg
772 ms
Kettering-amateur-fossil-hunters.jpg
887 ms
fossils-300x273.jpg
1027 ms
finding-fossils1-300x175.jpg
1025 ms
icon_smile.gif
982 ms
Nevada-mine-shaft-300x180.jpg
1024 ms
Granite-300x191.jpg
983 ms
Florida_Rockhounding-300x52.jpg
1025 ms
bear_fossil-186x300.jpg
1121 ms
mineral_club-300x51.jpg
1064 ms
lapidary_dvd.jpg
1118 ms
ca-pub-6439530258518490.js
121 ms
zrt_lookup.html
208 ms
show_ads_impl.js
122 ms
li.gif
1030 ms
lFePS20aEao
203 ms
ga.js
118 ms
2DugdwppF6s
292 ms
ads
376 ms
WhB25kt-D8E
220 ms
osd.js
113 ms
ads
385 ms
__utm.gif
52 ms
ads
300 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
34 ms
www-embed-player.js
64 ms
base.js
111 ms
ad_status.js
88 ms
css
174 ms
m_js_controller.js
99 ms
abg.js
83 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
115 ms
3363397966472910664
148 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
118 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
152 ms
10725758985662184159
133 ms
s
125 ms
x_button_blue2.png
125 ms
favicon
105 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
64 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
42 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
82 ms
rockhoundblog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rockhoundblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rockhoundblog.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockhoundblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rockhoundblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rockhoundblog.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockhoundblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: