Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

roflwall.com

男女啪啪一进一出无遮挡,激情第一区仑乱,欧美怡红院免费全部视频,野花社区视频www高清

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

272 ms

roflwall.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Roflwall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roflwall.com

男女啪啪一进一出无遮挡,激情第一区仑乱,欧美怡红院免费全部视频,野花社区视频www高清,国产白袜男gaychina霸道太子,国产欧美日韩另类色视频,工口里番全彩人妻系列

Visit roflwall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roflwall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roflwall.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.548

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roflwall.com

2531 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

112 ms

eap.css

115 ms

wp-automatic.css

132 ms

css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Roflwall.com, 15% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Roflwall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (75%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

672.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Roflwall.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 71.4 kB

  • Original 90.1 kB
  • After minification 85.4 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 339.4 kB
  • After minification 333.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roflwall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 469.9 kB

  • Original 652.5 kB
  • After minification 460.9 kB
  • After compression 182.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 469.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 137.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roflwall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (51%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roflwall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

roflwall.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

roflwall.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

roflwall.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roflwall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Roflwall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roflwall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: