Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

Page Load Speed

21.1 sec in total

First Response

307 ms

Resources Loaded

20.3 sec

Page Rendered

576 ms

romancecompass.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to romancecompass.com homepage info - get ready to check Romance Compass best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about romancecompass.com

Visit romancecompass.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Romancecompass.com page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 20.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

romancecompass.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

romancecompass.com

307 ms

styles_default.css

16 ms

styles_banner.css

17 ms

styles_menu.css

13 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Romancecompass.com, 7% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Romancecompass.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 663.8 kB (30%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Romancecompass.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 82.3 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Romance Compass images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 294.0 kB

  • Original 486.6 kB
  • After minification 486.2 kB
  • After compression 192.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 294.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 236.8 kB

  • Original 289.2 kB
  • After minification 287.1 kB
  • After compression 52.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Romancecompass.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 236.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (52%)

Requests Now

115

After Optimization

55

The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Romance Compass. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

romancecompass.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

romancecompass.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

romancecompass.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Romancecompass.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Romancecompass.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Romance Compass. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: