2.5 sec in total
435 ms
1.8 sec
238 ms
Welcome to row52.com homepage info - get ready to check Row52 best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about row52.com
Find recycled automotive parts from self service auto recycling yards!
Visit row52.comWe analyzed Row52.com page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
row52.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value2,050 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
435 ms
163 ms
411 ms
208 ms
819 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Row52.com, 50% (19 requests) were made to Cdn.row52.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Az362727.vo.msecnd.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (845 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.row52.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (49%)
3.0 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Row52.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Row52 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Row52.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)
36
27
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Row52. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
row52.com
435 ms
complete.css
163 ms
libraries.js
411 ms
global.js
208 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
819 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
845 ms
addthis_widget.js
32 ms
facebook.min.js
118 ms
ai.0.7.js
112 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
top-bg.png
477 ms
tiptop-bg.png
477 ms
logo.png
479 ms
icons.png
594 ms
search-bg.png
463 ms
search-icon.png
463 ms
1_slider_sideview.jpg
570 ms
2_slider_sideview.jpg
596 ms
3_slider_sideview.jpg
554 ms
4_slider_sideview.jpg
555 ms
5_slider_sideview.jpg
583 ms
6_slider_sideview.jpg
676 ms
logo-footer2.png
819 ms
collect
12 ms
step_divider.gif
573 ms
track
241 ms
footer-bg.png
186 ms
google_play.png
189 ms
itunes_store.png
201 ms
all.js
159 ms
makes
219 ms
0
380 ms
300lo.json
17 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
23 ms
57 ms
xd_arbiter.php
142 ms
xd_arbiter.php
231 ms
xd_arbiter.php
82 ms
row52.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
row52.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
row52.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Row52.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Row52.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
row52.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Row52. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: