Tools & Wizards About Us
royalapplications.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

royalapplications.com

Royal Apps

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

310 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

348 ms

royalapplications.com screenshot

About Website

Visit royalapplications.com now to see the best up-to-date Royal Applications content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royalapplications.com

Manage Everything! From the largest data centers, to test labs, to your home network, our products help you manage any kind of IT-infrastructure.

Visit royalapplications.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Royalapplications.com page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royalapplications.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.2

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royalapplications.com

310 ms

www.royalapplications.com

540 ms

revolution.css

358 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

518 ms

revolution.js

446 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Royalapplications.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Royalapplications.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 119.9 kB (48%)

Content Size

247.8 kB

After Optimization

127.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royalapplications.com main page is 247.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 117.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 11.5 kB
  • After minification 10.9 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 67.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Royal Applications needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 63.2 kB

  • Original 117.9 kB
  • After minification 117.3 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 27.8 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalapplications.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (48%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Applications. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royalapplications.com

royalapplications.com

310 ms

www.royalapplications.com

www.royalapplications.com

540 ms

revolution.css

revolution.css

358 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

518 ms

revolution.js

revolution.js

446 ms

css

css

60 ms

header_revolution.png

header_revolution.png

300 ms

logo_royalserver.png

logo_royalserver.png

398 ms

icon_windowsevents.png

icon_windowsevents.png

689 ms

icon_windowsprocesses.png

icon_windowsprocesses.png

442 ms

icon_windowsservices.png

icon_windowsservices.png

431 ms

icon_terminalservices.png

icon_terminalservices.png

368 ms

icon_hyperv.png

icon_hyperv.png

405 ms

icon_powershell.png

icon_powershell.png

596 ms

icon_securegateway.png

icon_securegateway.png

589 ms

icon_heart.png

icon_heart.png

521 ms

logo_royaltsx.png

logo_royaltsx.png

1116 ms

icon_rdp.png

icon_rdp.png

612 ms

icon_terminal.png

icon_terminal.png

641 ms

icon_vnc.png

icon_vnc.png

699 ms

icon_safari.png

icon_safari.png

735 ms

icon_teamviewer.png

icon_teamviewer.png

753 ms

logo_royalts.png

logo_royalts.png

797 ms

icon_web.png

icon_web.png

847 ms

icon_performance.png

icon_performance.png

802 ms

icon_externalapp.png

icon_externalapp.png

841 ms

logo_royalpasswords.png

logo_royalpasswords.png

905 ms

logo_royaltickets.png

logo_royaltickets.png

971 ms

icon_social_twitter.png

icon_social_twitter.png

959 ms

icon_social_facebook.png

icon_social_facebook.png

963 ms

icon_social_gplus.png

icon_social_gplus.png

1019 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

50 ms

HelveticaNeue-UltraLight.ttf

HelveticaNeue-UltraLight.ttf

1444 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

70 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

86 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

104 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

Accessibility Review

royalapplications.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

royalapplications.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

royalapplications.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalapplications.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalapplications.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royalapplications.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royal Applications. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: