28.2 sec in total
13.3 sec
14.7 sec
144 ms
Welcome to royceto.com homepage info - get ready to check Royce To best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about royceto.com
Welcome
Visit royceto.comWe analyzed Royceto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13.3 sec and then it took 14.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
royceto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
13321 ms
22 ms
12 ms
9 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Royceto.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Royceto.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (64%)
1.8 MB
643.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Royceto.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 858.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royce To images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 567.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 567.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 528.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royceto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 528.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (67%)
76
25
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royce To. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royceto.com
13321 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
22 ms
bootstrap.min.css
12 ms
font-awesome.min.css
9 ms
integrity-light.css
21 ms
css
34 ms
genericons.css
8 ms
jetpack.css
16 ms
jquery.js
29 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
28 ms
bootstrap.min.js
27 ms
x-head.min.js
28 ms
cs-head.min.js
28 ms
photon.js
28 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
26 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
28 ms
x-body.min.js
26 ms
cs-body.min.js
26 ms
postmessage.js
26 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
29 ms
jquery.inview.js
27 ms
queuehandler.js
28 ms
sharing.js
28 ms
e-201611.js
23 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
green-screen.001.jpeg
66 ms
green-screen.001.jpg
160 ms
loading.gif
65 ms
sdk.js
201 ms
IKHB3_gzUVw
145 ms
dK3S4WoGbLA
211 ms
a428GkLg70g
226 ms
EMyUplDCmbI
223 ms
collect
180 ms
collect
234 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
97 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
122 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
135 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
508 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
746 ms
Genericons.svg
529 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
2 ms
master.html
89 ms
js
90 ms
hovercard.css
65 ms
services.css
111 ms
graph.facebook.com
193 ms
g.gif
59 ms
graph.facebook.com
323 ms
graph.facebook.com
326 ms
graph.facebook.com
325 ms
graph.facebook.com
325 ms
graph.facebook.com
323 ms
loading.gif
47 ms
g.gif
49 ms
g.gif
49 ms
g.gif
48 ms
g.gif
48 ms
g.gif
49 ms
g.gif
50 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
118 ms
www-embed-player.js
140 ms
base.js
169 ms
jquery.js
55 ms
365 ms
xd_arbiter.php
218 ms
xd_arbiter.php
350 ms
ga-audiences
130 ms
postmessage.js
4 ms
jed.js
7 ms
underscore.min.js
6 ms
in.php
178 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
64 ms
ad_status.js
91 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
14 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
53 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
51 ms
likes-rest.js
3 ms
29 ms
batch
75 ms
1 ms
noticons.css
7 ms
style.css
7 ms
Noticons.svg
3 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
2 ms
royceto.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
royceto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
royceto.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royceto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royceto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royceto.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royce To. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: