6.2 sec in total
642 ms
5.3 sec
271 ms
Visit rpc.uk.com now to see the best up-to-date RPC content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rpc.uk.com
RPC offers the full end-to-end lifecycle for providing a Primavera solution for you. From Oracle Primavera training to Unifier solutions sets, consultancy, Oracle licenses, hosting, and support. Get i...
Visit rpc.uk.comWe analyzed Rpc.uk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 642 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rpc.uk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value1,680 ms
11/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
642 ms
161 ms
163 ms
165 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Rpc.uk.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpc.uk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (47%)
4.4 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rpc.uk.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RPC needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 139.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpc.uk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (27%)
66
48
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RPC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rpc.uk.com
642 ms
basic2.css
161 ms
ticker-style2.css
163 ms
twitter-styles.css
165 ms
cart.css
166 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
164 ms
ie6.css
307 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
8 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
547 ms
jquery.corner.js
316 ms
jquery.webticker.js
319 ms
sharedfunctions.js
319 ms
jquery.tweet.js
396 ms
foxy.js
537 ms
twitterfeed.js
472 ms
ddaccordion.js
550 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
629 ms
BrightcoveExperiences.js
9 ms
front2.css
626 ms
menu.css
470 ms
type.css
534 ms
ga.js
261 ms
loading2.gif
233 ms
logo.png
231 ms
header-line.png
391 ms
go.png
397 ms
facebook.png
392 ms
twitter.png
400 ms
youtube.png
560 ms
linkedin.png
565 ms
home.png
778 ms
line.png
550 ms
deliver.png
784 ms
planners.png
864 ms
software.png
942 ms
consultancy.png
946 ms
education.png
950 ms
training.png
1160 ms
infrastructure.png
1171 ms
solutions.png
1251 ms
greenbanner-11.gif
1563 ms
solutions-2.jpg
1650 ms
training-3.jpg
1575 ms
business-2.png
2024 ms
consultancy-2.png
2015 ms
infrastructure-3.png
2099 ms
planning-2.png
2271 ms
training-rpc-1.png
2500 ms
1-rpcextra.png
2037 ms
2-software.png
2398 ms
eppm-workshop.png
2409 ms
dashboards.png
2433 ms
home-green-closed.png
2488 ms
details-button-home.png
2657 ms
home-green-sub.png
2799 ms
home-red-closed.png
2799 ms
details-button-home-red.png
2823 ms
user_timeline.json
121 ms
cart.php
202 ms
twitterapinew.php
3527 ms
overlay.png
142 ms
home-red-sub.png
2710 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
green-cta-w427-1-w427-w427.jpg
2618 ms
collect
66 ms
ppp-reviews-w427.png
2747 ms
new-home-signup.png
3295 ms
new-home-project-challenge.png
2847 ms
project-challenge-video-w640h480-1-w640h480.png
2910 ms
new-home-tweet.png
3169 ms
footer.png
3198 ms
nF05DEcY_normal.png
163 ms
print.css
158 ms
rpc.uk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rpc.uk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rpc.uk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpc.uk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpc.uk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rpc.uk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RPC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: