62.5 sec in total
14.4 sec
47.7 sec
455 ms
Click here to check amazing Rpmi content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rpmi.ir
Visit rpmi.irWe analyzed Rpmi.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 14.4 sec and then it took 48.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
rpmi.ir performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value19.2 s
0/100
25%
Value19.2 s
0/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
14376 ms
447 ms
2697 ms
4452 ms
1103 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rpmi.ir and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpmi.ir.
Page size can be reduced by 350.5 kB (33%)
1.1 MB
704.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Rpmi.ir main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 748.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rpmi needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 230.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpmi.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)
66
30
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpmi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rpmi.ir
14376 ms
modal.css
447 ms
icomoon.css
2697 ms
rpmi.ir
4452 ms
module_default.css
1103 ms
style.css
457 ms
animate.css
1655 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite_rtl.css
2534 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite-fade.css
1425 ms
addons.css
2206 ms
template-j30.css
1875 ms
template.css
2095 ms
layout.css
2117 ms
usertools.css
2321 ms
css3.css
2350 ms
mega.css
3334 ms
k2.css
2836 ms
typo.css
2650 ms
template.css
4472 ms
layout.css
2864 ms
mega.css
2880 ms
mod_jasidenews.css
3109 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite.css
3129 ms
k2.css
3127 ms
template.css
3342 ms
mega.css
3344 ms
mod_jasidenews.css
3368 ms
mod_jaslideshowlite.css
3577 ms
template.css
4376 ms
usertools.css
3602 ms
template.css
3629 ms
index.php
11444 ms
k2.js
3814 ms
index.php
8515 ms
logo.png
645 ms
icon-search.png
267 ms
mainnav-active-bg.gif
242 ms
arrow3.png
225 ms
sl-112_900_386.jpg
3039 ms
sl-12_900_400.jpg
2688 ms
sl-14_900_396.jpg
6219 ms
sl-9_900_400.jpg
4244 ms
sl-112_1_1.jpg
499 ms
sl-12_1_1.jpg
723 ms
sl-14_1_1.jpg
878 ms
sl-9_1_1.jpg
911 ms
11.jpg
4808 ms
mirzakhani7893_140_100.jpg
1147 ms
rajabalipour_140_100.jpg
1340 ms
iq-yasgroup_140_100.gif
1550 ms
s10.jpg
4841 ms
mask-left.png
4261 ms
mask-right.png
3172 ms
sl-thumb.png
3422 ms
sl-btn-direction.png
3643 ms
homa.woff
6242 ms
logo.png
20399 ms
dep-1.png
4732 ms
dep-2.png
7469 ms
dep-3.png
5224 ms
dep-5.png
6089 ms
dep-8.png
5671 ms
dep-6.png
7127 ms
BYekan.woff
6276 ms
pattern-bg.png
6272 ms
icon-socials.png
6515 ms
slideloading.gif
6827 ms
homa.ttf
4252 ms
BYekan.ttf
3259 ms
layout-mobile.css
258 ms
layout-mobile-port.css
230 ms
layout-tablet.css
1042 ms
rpmi.ir accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rpmi.ir best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rpmi.ir SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FA
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpmi.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpmi.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rpmi.ir
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rpmi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: