2.5 sec in total
243 ms
2.1 sec
141 ms
Visit rtag.co now to see the best up-to-date Rtag content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtag.co
Visit rtag.coWe analyzed Rtag.co page load time and found that the first response time was 243 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rtag.co performance score
243 ms
805 ms
114 ms
71 ms
108 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rtag.co, 43% (23 requests) were made to Ritetag.com and 17% (9 requests) were made to 1487482361.rsc.cdn77.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (905 ms) relates to the external source Ritetag.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (62%)
2.1 MB
791.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rtag.co main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtag.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (29%)
42
30
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtag.co
243 ms
ritetag.com
805 ms
201603191240-libs.min.css
114 ms
css
71 ms
25195ef7.js
108 ms
201603191240-global.min.css
133 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
52 ms
css
83 ms
TweenLite.min.js
31 ms
CSSPlugin.min.js
41 ms
201603191240-libs.min.js
101 ms
201603191240-global.min.js
100 ms
25195ef7.css
8 ms
dc.js
180 ms
fbevents.js
361 ms
arrow-signup.png
132 ms
logo.png
106 ms
feature-audit.png
105 ms
feature-stats.png
105 ms
feature-scans.png
105 ms
logo-time.png
218 ms
logo-inc.png
334 ms
logo-businessInsider.png
334 ms
logo-theNextWeb.png
334 ms
logo-forbes.png
334 ms
logo-hootsuite.png
678 ms
logo-sej.png
349 ms
logo-socialMediaExaminer.png
441 ms
logo-venturebeat.png
440 ms
logo-huffpost.png
438 ms
logo-entrepreneur.png
443 ms
logo-buffer.png
461 ms
spotify.png
753 ms
tedxflourcity.png
652 ms
semrush.png
694 ms
nestle.png
761 ms
purina.png
571 ms
kitkat.jpg
905 ms
childfund.jpg
759 ms
vantagepr-logo.jpg
789 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
115 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
121 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
143 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
124 ms
ngiFXK5ukde3w4E-Lmb_OnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
143 ms
K95WapF0Wa6u7CY0wsZbXqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
143 ms
gs9rvuKkonuI8a0WE1GSuwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
143 ms
widget-1.4.gz.js
622 ms
read
713 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
96 ms
Y2hhdA%3D%3D
99 ms
ZmVlZGJhY2s%3D
187 ms
rtag.co SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtag.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rtag.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtag.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: