995 ms in total
10 ms
701 ms
284 ms
Click here to check amazing RtCamp content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rtcamp.com
rtCamp provides finely-crafted, powerful WordPress enterprise solutions and consulting that empower your audience & employees alike.
Visit rtcamp.comWe analyzed Rtcamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 985 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rtcamp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value12,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.0 s
1/100
10%
10 ms
43 ms
15 ms
41 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Rtcamp.com, 26% (11 requests) were made to Cdn.rtcamp.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (395 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.rtcamp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 502.8 kB (34%)
1.5 MB
971.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Rtcamp.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 779.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RtCamp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 317.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtcamp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (49%)
35
18
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RtCamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtcamp.com
10 ms
rtcamp.com
43 ms
autoptimize_a18412702a9f5453ce336ab5a0a9154d.css
15 ms
dashicons.min.css
41 ms
css
92 ms
jquery.js
49 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
50 ms
edd-ajax.min.js
58 ms
rtwpideas-custom-script.js
49 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
49 ms
tracking.min.js
58 ms
main.js
57 ms
jquery.form.min.js
56 ms
highlight.js
59 ms
helpdesk-shortcode-min.js
58 ms
wp-lightbox-2.min.js
65 ms
main.min.js
64 ms
rt-as-common.js
64 ms
wp-embed.min.js
64 ms
recaptcha_ajax.js
64 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
43 ms
logo.png
395 ms
logo.png
178 ms
analytics.js
395 ms
locator-map.png
18 ms
nginx-logo.png
204 ms
NewRelic-logo-square-small-v2.png
211 ms
geometric-client-logo.png
209 ms
rotimatic-logo.png
204 ms
isha-foundation-logo.png
207 ms
Ulzzangstyle.png
228 ms
isha-blog-portfolio.png
230 ms
rotimatic.png
228 ms
gerard-nicol-80x80.jpg
211 ms
S-K-Prasad-Iyer-80x80.jpg
216 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
248 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
256 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
274 ms
themify.woff
16 ms
ec.js
12 ms
collect
27 ms
collect
56 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
rtcamp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
rtcamp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rtcamp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtcamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtcamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtcamp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RtCamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: