3.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.3 sec
131 ms
Visit rtgtr.co now to see the best up-to-date Rtgtr content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtgtr.co
Visit rtgtr.coWe analyzed Rtgtr.co page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rtgtr.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.119
85/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
1204 ms
24 ms
315 ms
267 ms
170 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Rtgtr.co, 19% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rtgtr.co.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (86%)
1.2 MB
169.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rtgtr.co main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 605.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 491.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 491.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 530.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtgtr.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 530.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (89%)
19
2
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtgtr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtgtr.co
1204 ms
css
24 ms
bootstrap.css
315 ms
font-awesome.css
267 ms
magnific-popup.css
170 ms
datepicker3.css
204 ms
theme.css
810 ms
default.css
221 ms
theme-custom.css
236 ms
modernizr.js
342 ms
jquery.js
1031 ms
jquery.browser.mobile.js
331 ms
bootstrap.js
509 ms
nanoscroller.js
440 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
590 ms
magnific-popup.js
584 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
565 ms
theme.js
763 ms
theme.custom.js
632 ms
theme.init.js
712 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
26 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
11 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
5 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
5 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
234 ms
rtgtr.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
rtgtr.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
rtgtr.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtgtr.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rtgtr.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtgtr.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtgtr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: