Analyze
rub.im — rub.im,rub Im,rub,venus,vigor,crystal,crystalize

rub.im,rub Im,rub,venus,vigor,crystal,crystalize

Tests Rating

Successful: 6

Failed: 2

61/100

Page load speed analysis

Visit rub.im now to see the best up-to-date Rub content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rub.im

We analyzed Rub.im page load time and found that the first response time was 474 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

474 ms

First response

2.9 sec

Resources loaded

433 ms

Page rendered

3.8 sec

Total page load time

Normal result

Network requests diagram

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Rub.im, 39% (33 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 12% (10 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (654 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.

Name
Timeline

Page size

In fact, the total size of Rub.im main page is 366.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 191.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML optimization

17.4 kB original
16.0 kB after minification
4.8 kB after compression

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image optimization

130.7 kB original
125.9 kB after optimization

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript optimization

191.3 kB original
150.5 kB after minification
51.8 kB after compression

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS optimization

26.6 kB original
21.9 kB after minification
5.0 kB after compression

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rub.im needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Good result

Total page size 366.1 kB

Size after compression 187.4 kB (49% less)

Requests

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

28

Javascripts

47

Images

8

CSS

1

AJAX

84

All

Possible request optimization

1

Javascripts

32

Images

1

CSS

1

AJAX

49

Optimized

35

All

Normal result

IP address

Rub.im uses IP address which is currently shared with 4 other domains. The more sites share the same IP address, the higher the host server’s workload is. It is strongly recommended that the host server should be changed or the hosting provider should be requested to give a different (separate) IP address for this domain.

Poor result

IP Trace

rub.im

bridgemanart.com

pic.im

smallbusinessgrowthclub.co.uk

allwebdesignresources.com

109.68.33.18

DNS records

Type Host Target/ip TTL Other
A

rub.im

109.68.33.18 14399
NS

rub.im

ns1.domainmonster.com 14399
NS

rub.im

ns3.domainmonster.com 14399
NS

rub.im

ns2.domainmonster.com 14399
SOA

rub.im

14399 Mname: ns1.domainmonster.com
Rname: hostmaster.rub.im
Serial: 1472942948
Refresh: 7200
Retry: 1800
Expire: 1209600
Minimum-ttl: 7200

Language and encoding

Normal result

Language

EN en language flag

Detected

N/A  language flag

Claimed

Encoding

UTF-8

Claimed

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rub.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rub.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

HTTPS certificate

SSL Certificate

Rub.im has no SSL certificate. Web browsing can be safer with HTTPS connection, so we suggest that it should be obtained for this site.

Normal result

Visitor World Map

The server of Rub.im is located in United Kingdom, but, unfortunately, we cannot identify the countries where the visitors come from and thus it’s impossible to define if the distance can potentially affect the page load time.

Good result

Poor result

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

rub.im

Share this report in social media

Analyze another website

Analyze